Experimental Demonstrations of Spontaneous, Solar-Driven Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting
This presentation will review laboratory demonstrations of spontaneous, solar water splitting. There are a number of design considerations which arise when considering the full solar to fuel conversion system. These include the type and number of semiconductor junctions used to generate the requisite photovoltage, the use of co-catalysts, the electrolyte conditions, a product separation method such as a membrane, and the geometric layout and size of components. To date, all approaches which have a solar to hydrogen (STH) conversion efficiency of >5% employ either 2 or 3 semiconductor junctions arranged in a voltage-additive tandem configuration. The degree of integration varies widely, as well as the definition of this term. Some demonstrations employ isolated photovoltaic elements connected by wires to hydrogen and oxygen evolution catalysts that are in contact the electrolyte. Others employ a more integrated strategy, with the photocathode and/or the photoanode in near or direct contact with the electrolyte. A small subset of devices employ a mechanism, such as a proton or anion conducting membrane, to separate products and yield a pure H2 stream.
Reported STH conversion efficiencies range from <1% to 18%. In most cases, these are calculated by measuring current densities and assuming 100% Faradaic efficiency, though H2 production rates are measured directly in some reports. It will be emphasized that STH values are not validated by an independent test facility as is the case with solar photovoltaic efficiency “world records” . Device longevities under operation will also be discussed. Again, while there is not an accepted protocol for reporting device lifetime, it will be shown that few reports demonstrate operation for >24 hours. Standard and accepted international guidelines and protocols for evaluating and reporting device metrics for complete and integrated solar water splitting systems would be of great value in quantifying technological progress in the field.
1. M. G. Walter, E. L. Warren, J. R. McKone, S. W. Boettcher, Q. Mi, E. A. Santori, and N. S. Lewis, Chem. Rev. 110, 6446 (2010).
2. J. Rongé, T. Bosserez, D. Martel, C. Nervi, L. Boarino, F. Taulelle, G. Decher, S. Bordiga, and J. A. Martens, Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 7963 (2014).
3. A. J. Nozik Applied Physics Letters 29, 150 (1976).