(Invited) Electrochemical Characterization of Lithium-Ion Cells Based on Li1.2Ni0.15Mn0.55Co0.1O2 and Li4Ti5O12
All electrodes in this study are from the Cell Analysis, Modeling, and Prototyping (CAMP) facility at Argonne.3 The positive electrodes contained a coating of 92 wt% Li1.2Ni0.15Mn0.55Co0.1O2, 4 wt% C45 carbons and 4 wt% PVDF binder on an Al current collector. The negative electrodes contained a coating of 87 wt% Li4Ti5O12, 5 wt% C45 carbons and 8 wt% PVDF binder, also on an Al current collector. Electrochemical tests were conducted in 2032-type coin cells (1.6 cm2 electrodes) housed in a 30°C temperature chamber. All cells were assembled in an argon-atmosphere glove box and contained Celgard 2325 separator and EC:EMC (3:7 by wt.) + 1.2 M LiPF6 (aka Gen 2) electrolyte. The cells were cycled in 2 voltage ranges – 0.75-2.55 V (2.3-4.1 V vs. Li/Li+), which is below the oxide activation plateau, and 0.75-3.15 V (2.3-4.7 V vs. Li/Li+), which is above the oxide activation plateau. Cell capacity, voltage, energy and impedance data over 500 cycles were obtained during the testing period.
Some observations from our experiments are as follows:
- The Li1.2Ni0.15Mn0.55Co0.1O2 is not ‘activated’ during the 0.75-2.55 V cycling. Therefore cell capacity is low, 70 mAh-g(oxide)-1, and cell impedance is high. After 500 cycles, cell capacity is mostly unchanged but cell impedance rises, exclusively at the positive electrode. Voltage fade, is any, is minimal even after long term cycling.
- The Li1.2Ni0.15Mn0.55Co0.1O2 is ‘activated’ during the 0.75-3.15 V cycling, and the cell yields a significantly higher capacity, 230 mAh-g(oxide)-1, which is mostly unchanged. However, cell impedance rises and significant voltage fade is observed after 500 cycles; both features can be attributed to the positive electrode.
Additional experiments, including electrochemical measurements and physicochemical diagnostic studies on harvested electrodes and electrolytes will be detailed. The consequences of LTO-based negative electrodes on cell energy and performance degradation will be discussed during the presentation.
Support from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Vehicle Technologies Program is gratefully acknowledged. We are grateful to S. Trask, B. Polzin, and A. Jansen from the CAMP Facility (Argonne), which is fully supported within the core funding of the Applied Battery Research (ABR) for Transportation Program.
- Bettge et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 160 (2013) A1-A10.
- Trask et al., J. Power Sources 259 (2014) 233-244.
- Abraham et al., Electrochimica Acta 51 (2005) 502-510.