963
Comparative Corrosion Behavior of Austenitic Stainless Steels in Carbonate Melt at 650 °C Under Controlled CO2-O2 Environment

Thursday, 2 June 2016: 10:00
Indigo 204 B (Hilton San Diego Bayfront)
S. P. Sah, E. Tada, and A. Nishikata (Tokyo Institute of Technology)
Concentrated solar power (CSP) has recently attracted much attention as clean energy mainly for base load applications. High temperature CSP technology has high efficiency and it can attract wide commercial applications. Corrosion of metallic materials is a key problem for high temperature CSP systems. Careful selection of molten medium and metallic material can slow down the corrosion processes and hence extend the overall life span of CSP plants. High temperature oils and nitrate-based salts are commonly used for commercial CSP plants. These materials are not stable at temperature higher than 600 °C. However, alkali metal carbonates are stable beyond 800 °C and have working temperature of ~ 400-800 °C. These carbonates are less expensive and more environment friendly than the state-of-art high temperature oils [1]. Employing high corrosion resistance of cheaper alloys, like stainless steels, could significantly promote the popularity of CSP plants. In this study, corrosion behavior of austenitic stainless steels (SS) is observed in ternary alkali carbonate melt at 650 °C under defined CO2-Ogas environment.   

Weight loss, electrochemical characterization and morphological and microstructural examination were carried out to understand the corrosion behavior of Type 304 SS, Type 316L SS and Type 310S SS in 43Li2CO3-31.5Na2CO3-25K2CO3 (mol%) melt at 650 °C under flowing 0.98 atm CO2-0.02 atm Omixed gas.

Weight loss observed due to 24 hours corrosion is 7.7 mg cm-2 for Type 304 SS, 6.5 mg cm-2 for Type 316L SS and 1 mg cm-2 for Type 310S SS. Potentiodynamic polarization showed that corrosion of SS is a cathodic-controlled process. Corrosion potential of Type 310S SS is nobler than that of Type 316L and Type 304 SS. Reduced weight loss of Type 310S SS due to corrosion should be due to high potential of anode reaction. Cathodic limiting current is not significantly different for all the SS; however, it is slightly higher for Type 304 SS than that of Type 316L and should be responsible for slightly higher weight loss of Type 304 SS. Anodic polarization behavior well agrees with the weight loss observed for all the examined SS. SEM and EDS analysis showed that a very thin Cr-rich uniform corrosion layer is formed on Type 310S; however, thicker corrosion layer formed on Type 304 is composed of a heterogeneous mixture of Cr- and Fe-rich phases. Corrosion layer formed on Type 316L is Cr-rich but locally contains Fe-rich phases. Corrosion resistance of SS in carbonate melt in decreasing order is as: Type 310S>Type 316L>Type 304.

This work was supported by Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI), Cross-ministerial Strategic Innovation Promotion Program (SIP), “energy carrier” (Funding agency: JST).


Reference

K. Vignarooban, X. Xu, A. Arvay, K. Hsu, A. M. Kannan, Applied Energy, 146 (2015) 383-396