In this work, we present the study of long-term degradation mechanisms of porous La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3 (LSCF6428) cathodes under thermal annealing. LSCF6428 symmetric electrode cells with Gd0.1Ce0.9O1.95 (GDC) electrolytes were maintained at an elevated SOFC operating temperature of 800°C for ~ 800 hours in ambient air, without current/polarization. As illustrated in Fig. 1, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements taken periodically at 700°C showed a polarization resistance increase of ~ 120%, from 0.15 to 0.33 Ω∙cm2. The electrode morphological changes and Sr surface segregation were examined using a combination of three-dimensional (3D) tomography via focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy (FIB-SEM) and surface composition measurements using XPS and a chemical etching procedure with inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) detection [9]. The 3D imaging showed that there was no coarsening or sintering of the LSCF6428 electrode microstructure that could affect electrochemical performance during annealing. However, the ICP‑OES analysis found an increased amount of water-soluble Sr on the surface of annealed samples, from 1.3 nmol Sr/cm2 to 3.9 nmol Sr/cm2, when normalized to the LSCF6428 particle surface measured from 3D image data. Assuming that the measured Sr phase is SrO, the water-soluble Sr amount on freshly prepared cells would correspond to 1.04±0.22 atomic layers and agree well with reports on Sr-doped perovskite-type model thin films suggesting a SrO termination [9]. The Adler-Lane-Steel (ALS) model was then applied, again making use of 3D image data, to examine the effect of Sr surface segregation on the oxygen surface exchange process.
Fig. 1. EIS results showing polarization resistance measured for a single LSCF6428 cathode during 800°C anneal. Temperature was temporarily reduced to 700°C during EIS measurements and back to 800°C afterwards.
References
[1] S. B. Adler, Chem. Rev., 104, 4791 (2004).
[2] L. W. Tai, M. M. Nasrallah, H. U. Anderson, D. M. Sparlin, S. R. Sehlin, Solid State Ionics, 76, 259 (1995).
[3] L. W. Tai, M. M. Nasrallah, H. U. Anderson, D. M. Sparlin, S. R. Sehlin, Solid State Ionics, 76, 273 (1995).
[4] A. Esquirol, N. P. Brandon, J. A. Kilner, M. Mogensen, J. Electrochem. Soc., 151, A1847 (2004).
[5] Z. Pan, Q. Liu, L. Zhang, X. Zhang, S. H. Chan, J. Electrochem. Soc., 162, F1316 (2015).
[6] L. Zhao, J. Drennan, C. Kong, S. Amarasinghe, S. P. Jiang, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2, 11114 (2014).
[7] Y. Liu, K. Chen, L. Zhao, B. Chi, J. Pu, S. P. Jiang, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 39, 15868 (2014).
[8] S. P. Simner, M. D. Anderson, M. H. Engelhard, J. W. Stevenson, Electrochem. Solid State Lett,, 9, A478 (2006).
[9] G. M. Rupp, A. Limbeck, M. Kubicek, A. Penn, M. Stӧger-Pollach, G. Fredbacher, J. Fleig, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2, 7099 (2014).