3D geometries featuring hexagonal, diamond, squared, triangular and circular cross section were fabricated. Their characteristic dimension, side length in the case of polygons or diameter for circles, varied among the values 10, 20, 30, 40, 80, and 160 µm. Arrays of 5 by 5 were made for each of the shapes. The gap between individual features varied among the values 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, and 45 µm. For a given exposure power, the time of exposure was varied from 10 to 40 s in increments of 10 to achieve a varying exposure dose. After fabrication, the structures were analyzed using an optical microscope.
Initial results are summarized in Figure 1 for different cross sections with varying size (x-axis) and gap (y-axis) in between them. A specific color is used for a given cross section to facilitate interpretation of the graphs. Figure 1c presents results for shapes closest to each other by a point, as in an array of triangles. The analysis of shapes with a flat side in between them, as in an array of squares, is shown in figure 1d. A number of cases are analyzed here: No Bridges (NB), Spikes (S), Broken Bridges (BB), Stable Bridges (SB), Merged posts (M), Irregular posts (IR); depending on the nature of the joint between them or the absence of any contact. The points marked as irregular are those which are not straight or completely missing. Here we are interested on the formation of suspended wires or bridges. The results show that the formation of suspended bridges follows predictable trends. As the distance of the posts decreases, bridges form more easily. This can be observed looking at a single column in any of the graphs, and noticing that the type of connection follows the sequence NB-S-BB-SB-M, not necessarily featuring all the steps. The gap for which the bridge happens, depends on the size and the nature of the 3D shape. Comparing Figure 1a and 1b, it can be observed that bridges are formed for wider gaps in the case when shapes face each other on their sides rather than on a point. We hypothesize the reason behind this phenomenon is that shapes facing each other on their long sides have more material interaction than when facing by single points. Among the shapes facing each other by a point (figure 1c), the hexagonal is the best because it features a softer point, or a broader angle, that leads to improved interaction between neighboring shapes. Circles are somewhere in between the behavior of the other the interface types detailed above as they feature gradually curved interfaces.
Ongoing work is on characterizing SU-8 posts of different height to assess the impact of shape height in the formation of wires and bridges. The time of exposure is also being characterized. The next step will be carbonizing these structures and perform a similar characterization to correlate a photolithography process with the dimensions of a carbon wire that can be used for biosensing.
Figure 1: (a) Carbonized suspended bridge and wire; (b) SU-8 posts array showing structures connected by a bridge. Characterization results when (c) SU-8 posts are facing by their angular points; (d) SU-8 posts are facing by their sides and circular cross section.