1903
(Invited) Α-Mn2O3 Electrodes for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction - Catalytic Activity As a Function of Electrode Preparation

Monday, 30 May 2016: 10:40
Sapphire Ballroom I (Hilton San Diego Bayfront)
S. Fiechter (Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Institute for Solar Fuels), M. Kölbach (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie), A. Kratzig (Helmholtz Center Berlin, Institute for Solar Fuels), P. Hillebrand (Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Institute for Solar Fuels), A. Ramirez-Caro (HZB), K. Ellmer (Helmholtz Center Berlin, Institute for Solar Fuels), and P. Bogdanoff (Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, Institute for Solar Fuels)
In photosynthesis nature uses transition metal complexes as catalysts to evolve oxygen and hydrogen from water. In this process the catalytic centers are separated from the light capturing and absorbing co-factors in photosystem I and II integrated in the thylakoid membrane. To develop bio-inspired catalysts and to mimic e.g. the Mn3CaO3MnO complex in PSII, different manganese oxides as well as alkaline metal and earth alkali metal manganates were investigated with respect to the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in the process of water oxidation. In this contribution special attention will be turned to the structure - morphology– function relationship of these materials.

Manganese oxide electrodes have been prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering from a Mn target in an Ar/O2 atmosphere as well as by anodic electrodeposition and a subsequent annealing step. Besides amorphous MnOx obtained at low temperatures, crystallized oxides, such as γ-MnO2 and α-Mn2O3, were tested as electrocatalysts. Thin (60-70 nm) and dense layers were deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering using conductive glass (FTO) slides as substrates. Cross section transmission electron micrograph (Figure 1a) clearly revealed that the sputtered α-Mn2O3 layers consist of nanocrystals of
10 - 20 nm edge length. These layers show current densities of 10 mA/cm-2 at an overpotential of 370 mV (pH 13.8). Similar overvoltages were also obtained with electrodeposited α-Mn2O3 layers (10mA/cm-2 at 340 mV overvoltage). In contrast, the electrochemically deposited α-Mn2O3 layers are several 100 nm thick and appear highly porous (Figure 1b). Obviously, the specific activity related to the active surface area of the sputtered material is about one order of magnitude higher than the one of the electrodeposited samples. Nevertheless, higher current densities can be achieved with the electrodeposited material because high electrochemically active surface areas can be provided.

This behavior will be discussed as a function of defect chemistry and will be compared with the structure – function relationship of other OER electrocatalysts.

References

[1] A. Ramírez, P. Hillebrand, D. Stellmach, M. May, P. Bogdanoff, S. Fiechter; J. Phys Chem. C, 118 (2014) 14073-14081 and SI.

[2] M.M. Najafpour, T. Ehrenberg, M. Wiechen, P. Kurz; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 49 (2010) 2233-2237.

Figure 1: α-Mn2O3 deposited a) by reactive magnetron sputtering and b) by electrochemical deposition.