Sulfur with a theoretical specific capacity of 1672 mAh/g1, 2 is a promising candidate for high energy density lithium batteries. Sulfur being one of the abundant elements on the Earth’s crust adds advantages as a low cost and environmentally benign promising technology3. Despite these advantages, sulfur has very low conductivity (- 10-30 S/cm) which restricts the complete utilization of the active material. Sulfur forms non – intercalation based polysulfide intermediates (Li2Sn ; n = 2 – 8)4which are soluble in liquid electrolyte resulting in active material loss. In addition, the dissolved polysulfide gets coated onto the anode resulting in cell failure. These problems prevents the technology from being commercialized.
Utilizing mesoporous5 and hollow carbonaceous materials6, 7as sulfur hosts has shown to reduce polysulfide dissolution by avoiding direct contact with the liquid electrolyte. However, the pore size of these materials are in the order of µm and hence the problem of polysulfide dissolution has not been completely addressed. Porous materials with pore size comparable or less than the size of the polysulfide is required to completely overcome this problem.
In this work, highly ordered complex framework materials (CFM) were used as hosts for sulfur. These nano porous hosts trap the polysulfides formed during lithiation of sulfur and thus prevent active material loss with cycling. Two variants of the host were synthesized at room temperature and sulfur was infiltrated into them using infiltration techniques. These sulfur impregnated CFM cathodes showed a stable electrochemical performance with an initial discharge capacity of 1476 mAh/g which stabilized at 609 mAh/g for over 200 cycles (Figure 1). Results of these studies are presented and discussed.
References
1. J. R. Akridge, Y. V. Mikhaylik and N. White, Solid State Ionics, 2004, 175, 243-245.
2. X. Ji and L. F. Nazar, Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010, 20, 9821-9826.
3. G. C. Li, J. J. Hu, G. R. Li, S. H. Ye and X. P. Gao, Journal of Power Sources, 2013, 240, 598-605.
4. C.-N. Lin, W.-C. Chen, Y.-F. Song, C.-C. Wang, L.-D. Tsai and N.-L. Wu, Journal of Power Sources, 2014, 263, 98-103.
5. S.-R. Chen, Y.-P. Zhai, G.-L. Xu, Y.-X. Jiang, D.-Y. Zhao, J.-T. Li, L. Huang and S.-G. Sun, Electrochimica Acta, 2011, 56, 9549-9555.
6. W. Ahn, K.-B. Kim, K.-N. Jung, K.-H. Shin and C.-S. Jin, Journal of Power Sources, 2012, 202, 394-399.
7. J. Guo, Y. Xu and C. Wang, Nano Letters, 2011, 11, 4288-4294.