281
Advanced Processing and Electrochemical Analysis of Novel Sodium-Rich Anti-Perovskites Via Conventional Sintering and Spark Plasma Sintering Methods

Tuesday, 31 May 2016
Exhibit Hall H (San Diego Convention Center)
E. Wu, H. Nguyen (University of California, San Diego), S. Hy (University of California San Diego), T. A. Yersak (General Motors Global R&D), and Y. S. Meng (University of California San Diego)
Interest in non-flammable solid-state battery electrolytes continues to grow as they hold promise for batteries with increased safety, reliability, and energy density. They are nonflammable, stable over a wide temperature range, have a large electrochemical window, and potentially allow for the use of metallic Li anodes [1].

One particular solid-state electrolyte is the Lithium-rich anti-perovskite (LiRAP) with the formula Li3OX where X is a halogen or a mixture of halogens. Conductivities of >1 mS/cm were previously reported [2]. Interest in the material grew as the conductivity varied with different processing conditions thus opening the door to improvement with structura tweaking and optimization [3].

Whenever new a lithium compound is discovered in the battery field, interest in a sodium analog also arises. Na-ion batteries are considered a possible lower-cost alternative to lithium ion batteries due to the abundance of sodium. The conductivity of various Na-rich anti-perovskite (NaRAP) compounds with varying halogens were also previously reported [4]. 

Here we compare different synthesis methods for the Na3OBr compound, namely conventional cold-pressed sintering and spark plasma sintering. Spark plasma sintering enables a shorter processing time and more tightly-packed, dense pellets [5]. We report that the Na ionic conductivity for Na3OBr remained at similar values regardless of the synthesis method.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under grant number ACI-1053575.

References

[1] Thangadurai, V., Pinzaru, D., Narayanan, S., Baral, A. “Fast Solid State Li Ion Conducting Garnet-Type Structure Metal Oxides for Energy Storage”. J. Phys. Chem. Lett.20156 (2), pp 292–299. doi10.1021/jz501828v

[2] Wang, Y, Richards, W. D., Ong, S. P., Miara, L. J., Kim, J. C., Mo, Y., and Ceder, G. “Design principles for solid-state lithium superionic conductors”. Nature Materials, 2015, 14, pp 1026-1031. doi: 10.1038/nmat4369

[3] Deng, Z., Radhakrishnan, B., Ong, S. P. “Rational Composition Optimization of the Lithium-Rich Li3Ocl1-xBrx Anti-Perovskite Superionic Conductors”. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27 (10), pp 3749-3755. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b00988

[4] Wang, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, Z., Zhou, Z., Li, S., Zhu, J., Zou, R., Wang, Y., Lin, J., Zhao, Y.  “Structural manipulation approaches towards enhanced sodium ionic conductivity in Na-rich antiperovskites.” J. Power Sources 2015, 293, pp 735–740. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.002

[5] Sairam, K., Sonber, J. K., Murthy, T.S.R.Ch., Subramanian, C., Fotedar, R. K., Nanekar, P., Hubli, R.C. “Influence of spark plasma sintering parameters on densification and mechanical properties of boron carbide”. Int. Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, 2013, 42, pp 185-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2013.09.004