Thursday, 17 October 2019: 16:40
Room 217 (The Hilton Atlanta)
In recent years, continuous studies have highlighted the languished research state of Li–O2, and the impelling development of energy storage devices with analogously high theoretical energy density [1]. In preliminary studies, we established that fed O2 and CO2 mixtures (Li–O2/CO2) swiftly shift the reaction mechanism toward an exclusive formation of Li2CO3 in a TEGDME-based electrolyte. The proposed O2-assisted pathway is initiated by an electron transfer from the cathode, with subsequent CO4– formation and complete Li2O2 suppression. Compared with O2-driven counterparts, the CO2-based Li–air cell suffers, however, from higher overcharges during the decomposition of Li2CO3 at ~4.5 V, rendering impracticable a commercialization of these technologies [2]. Here we propose for the first time the incorporation of a redox mediator (RM) toward facile Li2CO3 oxidation in Li–O2/CO2 devices. Lithium bromide (LiBr) possessing two redox couples (Br−/Br3− and Br3−/Br2) has gathered increasing attention in conventional Li–air cells and was considered a suitable candidate in this study. All galvanostatic measurements were carried out under 30% CO2. At optimized concentrations, hindered recharge potentials (~0.5 V) at similarly sustained cyclability were demonstrated. Further dissection of the significance of involved Br−/Br3−/Br2 species inferred, however, an additional role of the RM in the stabilization of intermediate discharge species and in the undesirable formation of side-products. In this context, drawn conclusions reinforced the need to consider a deeper evaluation of the effects of a RM inclusion beyond an overcharge decrease and the urge to stabilize RM/RM+ species participating in deleterious side-reactions with neighboring species and cell components.
References
[1] Grande, E. Paillard, J. Hassoun, J.-B. Park, Y.-J. Lee, Y.-K. Sun, S. Passerini and B. Scrosati, Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 784.
[2] Qiao, J. Yi, S. Guo, Y. Sun, S. Wu, X. Liu, S. Yang, P. Hec and H. Zhou, Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 5, 1211.
