In this regard, we have carefully compared the stability of NASICON powder and pellets in both DI water and seawater associated with different degradation mechanism. Figure shows the structural stability of NASICON pellets after the immersion tests in DI water and seawater indicative of the chemical stability of NASICON in seawater. In addition, the electrochemical performance shows higher stability of the seawater-immersed electrolyte than the DI water-immersed electrolyte. The corresponding analyses are carried out to confirm the effect of the investigation.
Furthermore, we have employed polymer coating methods to enhance stability and performance as a seawater battery system. The coating layer enables to prevent direct contact with seawater, resulting in longer stability during operation without compromising ionic conductivity. These results reveal that NASICON solid electrolytes can be operated in seawater with high stability and performance.
Figure. The chemical stability comparison of NASICON in seawater and DI water
References
- Mauvy, F., Siebert, E., & Fabry, P. (1999). Reactivity of NASICON with water and interpretation of the detection limit of a NASICON based Na+ion selective electrode. Talanta, 48(2), 293–303.
- Fuentes, R. O., Figueiredo, F., Marques, F. M. B., & Franco, J. I. (2001). Reaction of NASICON with water, Solid State Ionics, 263, 309–314.
- Kim, Y., Kim, H., Park, S., Seo, I., & Kim, Y. (2016). Na ion- Conducting Ceramic as Solid Electrolyte for Rechargeable Seawater Batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 191, 1–7.
- Jung, J. Il, Kim, D., Kim, H., Jo, Y. N., Park, J. S., & Kim, Y. (2017). Progressive Assessment on the Decomposition Reaction of Na Superionic Conducting Ceramics. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 9(1), 304–310.

