LSCrF nano-powders were structurally characterized by means of X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) with Reitveld refinement by using GSAS software [4]. Cr rich samples shows more SrCrO4 impurity phase and bigger crystallite size than Fe-rich samples which leads to poor catalytic performance in the propane dehydrogenation process. Ex-situ X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy study was also performed for Fe (7112 eV) and Cr (5989 eV) K-edge in the fluorescence mode by using a 4-elements Vortex detector. When we looked at the XANES region of both Fe and Cr K edge XAS data to understand the electronic structure of Fe and Cr in the LSCrF powders, Cr K edge XAS data shows a sharp pre-edge peak resulting from SrCrO4 impurity phase having tetrahedral geometry of Cr+6 with 4-fold Oxygen atoms, whereas Fe K-edge XAS data does not show any pre-edge feature due to the octahedral geometry of Fe+3 in LSCrF perovskite structure, as we expect. the C3H8 conversion of Fe rich LSCrF samples (x<0) having more SrCrO4 pre-edge intensity and higher surface area is found higher than Cr-rich samples (x>0). Especially, Fe rich LSCr0.4Fe0.6O3 sample having wt.frac.~13.14% SrCrO4 impurity phase considered as better catalyst shows much lower carbon balance than other samples unsurprisingly due to its higher surface area with smaller crystallite size and having more catalytically active SrCrO4 pre-edge intensity proved by XANES analysis. Morphological analysis of the LSCrF powders was done by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM/EDX). BET measurements were also performed to calculate their surface area.
References:
[1] F. Lefebvre-Joud, G. Gauthier, and J. Mougin, “Current status of proton-conducting solid oxide fuel cells development,” J. Appl. Electrochem., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 535–543, 2009.
[2] M. F. Lü et al., “Thermomechanical, transport and anodic properties of perovskite-type (La0.75Sr0.25)0.95CrxFe1-xO3-δ” J. Power Sources, vol. 206, pp. 59–69, 2012.
[3] N. P. Bansal and B. Wise, “Sol-gel synthesis of La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ and Sm0.5Sr0.5CoO3-δ cathode nanopowders for solid oxide fuel cells,” Ceram. Int., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 5535–5541, 2012.
[4] Larson A C, “General Structure Analysis System (GSAS),” Los Alamos Lab. Rep., vol. 748, pp. 86–748, 1994.
