In this work, we investigated the structural changes of LVP during the first charge and discharge process of voltage window of 3.0V to 4.8V by using Galvanostatic Intermittent Titration Technique (GITT), synchrotron radiation-based X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) and in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD). The irreversible structural transitions between charge and discharge process are one of the possible reason for the capacity fading. Also, we conducted comparison study on the electrochemical and structural properties between LVP and Li3Ti0.03V1.97(PO4)3/graphene (LVP-Ti) to overcome limitations of LVP.
In situ XRD patterns show four consecutive two-phase transitions on LVP during the charge process. During the reinsertion of lithium ion, the patterns of LVP look like a combined process of single solid solution and two-phase transitions between full charged LVP (FC-LVP) and Li2V2(PO4)3 (Li2 phase) without forming Li1V2(PO4)3. In GITT data, a two phase transition behavior which was previously reported as a solid solution behavior during the Li-ion insertion from full charged LVP to Li2 phase in the discharge process is observed. From these data, it can be said that transforming behavior from FC-LVP to Li2 phase is closer to two-phase reaction.
In LVP-Ti case, the charge capacity was 185.84 mAh/g and the discharge capacity was 171.20 mAh/g in the first cycle, which were higher than those of LVP, 178.84 mAh/g and 162.99 mAh/g. And in situ XRD patterns show four consecutive two-phase transitions as in LVP. During the phase transition in charge/discharge, LVP-Ti faces less lattice mismatch than LVP, resulting in better electrochemical performance, and this phenomenon is originated from smaller particle size and enduring strain. The XAS result shows that the XANES peaks of LVP-Ti change gradually which is in line with the XRD result as same as in LVP case. However, the larger peak area of the pre-edge for LVP-Ti suggesting that more electrons were released upon charging. This means that the higher capacities of LVP-Ti is contributed by further utilization of the V redox reaction.
[1] Yin, S-C., Hiltrud Grondey, Pierre Strobel, M. Anne, and Linda F. Nazar. "Electrochemical property: structure relationships in monoclinic Li3-yV2(PO4)3." Journal of the American Chemical Society 125, no. 34 (2003): 10402-10411.
[2] Lee, S., & Park, S. S. (2012). Atomistic simulation study of monoclinic Li3V2(PO4)3 as a cathode material for lithium ion battery: structure, defect chemistry, lithium ion transport pathway, and dynamics. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 116(48), 25190-25197.
