Testing different carbon supported catalysts based on the DOE support degradation protocol gives first insights in the stability of the carbon. However, since multiple degradation processes happen at potentials above 1 V as mentioned above, further online analysis is needed to identify the degradation of the MEA based on corroding carbon.
Herein, we present measurements performed with a fuel cell test stand equipped with an ND-IR, which is connected to the cathode exhaust. Therefore, this setup allows for online quantification of CO and CO2 in the exhaust gas stream. Figure 1 shows the results obtained with an AST based on a DOE protocol for support degradation. Several characteristic features are observable. On the first sight, the eight air polarization curves are visible with increased oxygen amount. Furthermore, sharp CO and CO2 peaks are predominantly visible during the cycling under nitrogen. The measured and calculated amount of carbon has multiple possible origins: the support, the ionomer, the membrane, the gas diffusion layers, the flow fields and the tubing of the test stand. From blank tests we concluded, that the signal is from the carbon support and the ionomer. Integrating the signal gives a calculated amount of 1.6 mg carbon. On the MEA, a total of 3.72 mg carbon support is situated on the cathode side.
Our goal is to obtain a deeper understanding of the carbon corrosion processes occurring during fuel cell testing. Therefore, we show the degradation of different carbon supports. Changing the ionomer content gives us the opportunity to calculate the contribution of the ionomer during the degradation. Furthermore, post mortem cross section SEM analysis provides microscopic insight in the changes happening during the AST such as film thickness and particle distribution. Combining the better understanding of the degradation of carbon supports with new Pt based nanocatalysts will provide active and stable fuel cell catalysts to further move into the hydrogen society.
References:
- Ball, M.; Weeda, M., International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40 (25), 7903-19.
- Marbán, G.; Valdés-Solís, T., International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32 (12), 1625-37.
- Hansen, T. W.; Delariva, A. T.; CHalla, S. R.; Datye, A. K., Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46 (8), 1720-30.
- Oezaslan, M.; Hasché, F.; Strasser, P., The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2013, 4 (19), 3273-91.
- Macauley, N.; Papadias, D. D.; Spernjak, J. F. D.; Langlois, D.; Ahluwalia, R.; More, K. L.; Mukundan, R.; Borup, R. L., J. Electrochem. Soc 2018, 165 (6), F3148-60.
Figure 1: Data obtained from an AST performed with our fuel cell test stand (10 cm², 0.15 mg Pt/cm²) equipped with an ND-IR. The graph shows the results of the DOE protocol for support degradation (5000 cycles, 1.0 – 1.5 V, polarization curves between cycling)
