Here, we present a comprehensive investigation of ZnO-saturated electrolyte in more commercially relevant, non-flooded Ni–Zn cells at various high DODZn (10+%), analyzing its impact on cycle life and Zn electrochemistry. With additive-free KOH electrolyte, such high levels of Zn utilization limit the cells to only ~100 cycles, but cells with saturated electrolyte can achieve 180+ cycles at 10+% DODZn, even when this DOD accounts for ZnO in the electrolyte. Besides standard anodes consisting only of a mixture of Zn and ZnO particles with a polymeric binder, we examine ZnO-saturated electrolyte with Zn anodes containing Ca- and/or Bi-based additives, which have previously been shown to improve cycle life at 15% DODZn in additive-free electrolyte.[2] Changes in the morphology, distribution, and size of the active material particles in the anodes during cycling are characterized by ex situ scanning electron microscopy. Finally, we evaluate ZnO-saturated electrolyte in a MnO2–Zn system, which offers significantly higher theoretical energy density and lower cost per kWh than Ni–Zn but has heretofore not been studied with ZnO-saturated electrolyte because zincate can react with MnO2 to form electrochemically inactive compounds. As a path forward, we are developing zincate-blocking polymeric membranes that can essentially isolate the MnO2 cathode from zincate while maintaining good hydroxide conductivity, thereby allowing for reversible cycling of a MnO2–Zn cell at high DODZn. Various aspects of this work will also be presented.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. Dr. Imre Gyuk, Energy Storage Program Manager, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability is also thanked for his financial support of this project. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Department of Energy or the United States Government.
[1] A.R. Mainar, E. Iruin, L.C. Colmenares, J.A. Blázquez, H.-J. Grande, Energy Science & Engineering 6 (2018), 174–186.
[2] D.E. Turney, J.W. Gallaway, G.G. Yadav, et al., Chem. Mater. 29 (2017), 4819–4832.
