206
Reinforcing the Li|Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 Interfacial Stability By an Ultrathin Multifunctional Polysiloxane-Based Single-Ion Conducting Polymer

Monday, 30 May 2022: 09:10
West Meeting Room 110 (Vancouver Convention Center)
Z. Chen, H. P. Liang, D. Stepien, Z. Lyu, M. Zarrabeitia, M. Kuenzel, F. Wu, G. T. Kim, S. Passerini, and D. Bresser (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU))
Lithium metal is considered as one of the most promising anode candidates for high-energy batteries [1-3]. However, safety concerns induced by the formation of Li dendrites largely hinder the practical application of lithium-metal batteries [4]. It is anticipated that the use of non-flammable inorganic solid-state electrolytes can resolve these safety issues [5], but solid ceramic electrolytes generally suffer from poor physical contact with the electrode and poor electro-/chemical stability at the electrolyte|electrode interface [6].

Herein, we report on a thin and flexible hybrid electrolyte composed of NASICON-type Li1.3Al0.3Ti1.7(PO4)3 (LATP), a polymer binder, and a small amount of an ionic liquid-based electrolyte. To reinforce the interfacial stability between LATP and Li, we coat an ultrathin polysiloxane-based single-ion conducting polymer (PSiO) on the Li metal surface via a simple dip-coating method. The implementation of PSiO-coated Li (PSiO@Li) in symmetric PSiO@Li||PSiO@Li cells enables a substantial extension of the cycle life, yielding >2,000 h of stable lithium stripping-plating. The full-cells comprising PSiO@Li as the negative electrode, LiNi0.88Co0.09Mn0.03O2 (NCM88) as the positive electrode active material, and the aforementioned hybrid electrolyte exhibit substantially enhanced rate capability at high dis-/charge rates above 0.5C and greatly prolonged cycle life at 1C. The superior performance achieved herein is mainly attributed to: (1) the prevented direct contact between LATP and Li, thus avoiding the reduction of LATP and the formation of mixed ion-electron conducting interphases; (2) the regulated Li+ flux at the electrode|electrolyte interface, ensuring homogeneous Li+ stripping-plating; and (3) the promoted intimate contact between PSiO and Li via the formation of Si−O−Li bonds.

References

[1] T. Li, X.-Q. Zhang, P. Shi, Q. Zhang, Joule, 3 (2019) 2647-2661.

[2] B. Horstmann, J. Shi, R. Amine, M. Werres, X. He, H. Jia, F. Hausen, I. Cekic-Laskovic, S. Wiemers-Meyer, J. Lopez, D. Galvez-Aranda, F. Baakes, D. Bresser, C.-C. Su, Y. Xu, W. Xu, P. Jakes, R.-A. Eichel, E. Figgemeier, U. Krewer, J.M. Seminario, P.B. Balbuena, C. Wang, S. Passerini, Y. Shao-Horn, M. Winter, K. Amine, R. Kostecki, A. Latz, Energy Environ. Sci., 14 (2021) 5289-5314.

[3] S. Wang, P. Xiong, J. Zhang, G. Wang, Energy Storage Materials, 29 (2020) 310-331.

[4] Z. Yu, Y. Cui, Z. Bao, Cell Rep. Phy. Sci., 1 (2020) 100119.

[5] S. Xin, Y. You, S. Wang, H.-C. Gao, Y.-X. Yin, Y.-G. Guo, ACS Energy Lett., 2 (2017) 1385-1394.

[6] A. Banerjee, X. Wang, C. Fang, E.A. Wu, Y.S. Meng, Chem. Rev., 120 (2020) 6878-6933.