In this study, we investigated the effect of a water-based post-treatment of LMR-NCM. It consists of a washing process of the LMR-NCM that results in a partial delithiation of its near-suface region by a lithium/proton ion exchange, while at the same time avoiding transition metal dissolution. A recalcination of this protonated near-surface layer of the LMR‑NCM particles results in the formation of a protective spinel-like surface layer. We observed that after this treatment, the gassing during formation is decreased by »10‑fold. Furthermore, the cycling performance of graphite/LMR‑NCM full-cells is also drastically increased.
By conducting on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS) measurements, we analyzed the gas evolution of as-received and post-treated LMR-NCMs during the first activation cycle. It is known from the literature that the activation of LMR-NCMs is accompanied by a strong O2 and CO2 evolution during the first charge.[2] As seen in Figure 1, CO2 is evolved simultaneously with O2 from Li/LMR-NCM half-cells, prepared with untreated, as-received LMR‑NCM (as-received, black line). With post-treated LMR‑NCM, both CO2 and O2-evolution during the activation cycle are reduced by »10‑fold (post-treated, green line). Only a small amount of the first-charge capacity (<10%) is lost due to the post-treatment, as seen in Figure 1a, reflecting the slight extent of delithiation that is part of the post-treatment.
As will be shown, cycling tests of graphite/LMR‑NCM full-cells with a post-treated LMR-NCM reveal a greatly increased cycling stability in comparison to cells with an as-received material. Using TGA-MS, XPS and ICP-OES, we further elucidate the beneficial mechanism of the here developed water-based post-treatment.
References:
[1] D. Andre, S.-J. Kim, P. Lamp, S. F. Lux, F. Maglia, O. Paschos, B. Stiaszny, J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6709–6732.
[2] T. Teufl, B. Strehle, P. Müller, H. A. Gasteiger, M. A. Mendez, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, A2718–A2731.
[3] B. Strehle, K. Kleiner, R. Jung, F. Chesneau, M. Mendez, A. Hubert, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2017, 164, 400–406.
[4] Z. Zhu, D. Yu, Y. Yang, C. Su, Y. Huang, Y. Dong, I. Waluyo, B. Wang, A. Hunt, X. Yao, J. Lee, W. Xue, J. Li, Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 1049–1058.
[5] S. Ramakrishnan, B. Park, J. Wu, W. Yang, B. D. Mccloskey, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 8522–8531.
[6] A. Gue, C. Bolli, M. A. Mendez, E. J. Berg, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 290–299.
[7] J. Sicklinger, H. Beyer, L. Hartmann, F. Riewald, C. Sedlmeier, H. A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2020, 167, 130507.
Acknowledgements
This work is financially supported by the BASF SE Network on Electrochemistry and Battery Research.
Figure 1: OEMS measurements of the first lithiation half-cycle to 4.8 V of Li/LMR-NCM half-cells with either an as-received (black line) or a post-treated LMR-NCM (green line). a) Cell voltage vs. time at a C/rate of C/10 (referenced to 250 mAh/g delithiation capacity). b) CO2 evolution given in units of μmol/gCAM (determined from the signal at m/z = 44). c) O2 evolution (from m/z = 32). The half-cells were charged at 25°C, using an FEC/DEC (2:8) electrolyte with 1.0 m LiPF6.