Figure 1 shows the polarization curves of anion-exchange membrane fuel cells (AEMFCs) operating at 80 °C with AEMs grafted by PIM and SM. Comparing AEMFCs performances containing AEMs with similar IECs from the two different grafting methods, it is possible to notice that AEMs synthesized by PIM, in general, promote better fuel cell performances than the corresponding ones prepared by SM. The main differences in the polarization curves are evidenced in the ohmic and the mass transport limiting regions. This result suggests that water management is enhanced in AEMs synthesized by PIM compared to the SM-AEMs. A membrane that allows rapid back diffusion of liquid water from the anode to the cathode, should reduce the current losses due to mass transport limitations.
The gel content results confirmed the presence of more crosslinking in membranes synthesized by PIM than in the ones synthesized by the SM. As a consequence of that, enhanced mechanical properties were found for PIM-AEMs, indicating polymer backbone reinforcement due to high degree of crosslinking. Small-angle X-ray scattering measurements have confirmed that the microstructure of PIM and SM AEMs are different and this feature is directly related to ion conduction and water transportation.
Figure 1. AEMFCs performances at 80 °C with LDPE-based AEMs grafted by the pre-irradiation method and by the simultaneous method. H2 anode gas flow=0.8 L min-1, O2 cathode gas flow=0.5 L min-1, both supplied unpressurized with optimal dewpoint temperatures ranging from 77 to 80 °C. AEMs are referred according to the grafting method and absorbed dose. 30 and 70-EB-PIM refer to the samples irradiated with 30 and 70 kGy, respectively, in the EB accelerator and grafted by the pre-irradiation method. 20 and 25-γ-SM refer to AEMs irradiated with 20 and 25 kGy, respectively, by γ-rays and grafted by the simultaneous method.