1355
Electrolysis Modeling for Two-Electrode Systems from Well-Characterized Electrodes

Tuesday, 31 May 2022: 11:20
West Meeting Room 219 (Vancouver Convention Center)
N. Stubb (The University of British Columbia), T. Borsboom-Hanson (University of British Columbia), A. McLeod, R. Parmar (The University of British Columbia), and W. Mérida (University of British Columbia)
Polarization curves are useful tools to predict electrochemical performance and diagnose system failures[1][2]. The construction of a reliable polarization curve requires a three-electrode system in which a reference electrode is used. In some systems, such as fuel cells, the use of a reference electrode is often impossible or impractical due the cell design[3][4]. We report a model that reliably predicts the behavior of well-characterized electrodes at temperatures up to 400 °C and 30 MPa without a reference electrode. We define well-characterized electrodes as those electrodes with reliable data for the charge transfer coefficient (α), the apparent activation energy (Ae), the resistance (RΩ) and the exchange current density (j0,ref) at a reference temperature (Tref ) for the reaction system under consideration.

We report that the net reaction can be modeled by simply performing a linear combination of the total potential for the half-cell reactions at the anode and cathode, that is Etotal,a+c = Etotal,a + Etotal,c, where Etotal,a = Erev,a + Eη,a + EIR,a and Etotal,c = Erev,c + Eη,c + EIR,c.

The net reaction being modelled by a simple linear combination of the half-cell reactions at the anode and cathode is not intuitive, as the potential due to ohmic losses appears to have been accounted for twice (EIR,a + EIR,c). In our cell design, the maximum variation in R is 4.76 Ω, which corresponds to a variation of about 0.4 Ω cm-1 for the electrodes in our system, which have surface areas within 15% of each other.

Using this method, an estimated potential component breakdown can be found using only the net reaction data and the parameters obtained from the characterization of the electrodes.

References:

[1] Wang, L., Husar, A., Zhou, T., & Liu, H. (2003). A parametric study of PEM fuel cell performances. International journal of hydrogen energy, 28(11), 1263-1272.

[2] Serra, P. M. D., Espírito-Santo, A., & Magrinho, M. (2020). A steady-state electrical model of a microbial fuel cell through multiple-cycle polarization curves. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109439.

[3] Winkler, J., Hendriksen, P. V., Bonanos, N., & Mogensen, M. (1998). Geometric requirements of solid electrolyte cells with a reference electrode. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 145(4), 1184.

[4] Liu, Z., Wainright, J. S., Huang, W., & Savinell, R. F. (2004). Positioning the reference electrode in proton exchange membrane fuel cells: calculations of primary and secondary current distribution. Electrochimica Acta, 49(6), 923-935.

Figure caption:

A comparison of the raw data gathered from the two electrode system and values determined from the model using parameters obtained from characterizing the electrodes at room temperature. Eη,a, Eη,c, and Eη,total are the values for overpotential from the anode, cathode and net reaction respectively as calculated by the model. Etotal,a, Etotal,c, and Etotal,net show the total potential for the anode, cathode, and net reaction, respectively. Etotal,a + Etotal,c is a linear combination of Etotal,a and Etotal,c which closely matches Etotal,net.