To bridge this gap, we employ molecular dynamics (MD) and Hamiltonian replica exchange (HREX) simulations to unveil: (1) the interactions between the biomolecule and the nanotube to which it is attached in the device and (2) the electrostatic potential on the nanotube as the state of the biomolecule changes. We address these questions by considering three prototypical cases: the function of the Lysozyme protein, the hybridization of 10-nt DNA sequence and the folding of a DNA G-quadruplex, which were previously characterized using CNT-bioFETs [1-5].
Our simulations show that the lysozyme, the 10-nt DNA sequence and the DNA G-quadruplex interact differently with the nanotube to which they are attached. Consequently, the electrostatic potential (ESP) that they generate on the nanotube is very sensitive to the type and state of the biomolecule. When compared to experiment, the ESP distribution for the with-ligand and without-ligand states of the Lysozyme protein are in line with the measured two-level conductance by CNT-bioFETs. For the DNAs, however, the ESP distribution for their different states does not agree with the measured two-level conductance. Experiments imply that the DNA strand is not interacting with the nanotube, which is not what our simulations suggest. The reason for this apparent conflict could arise from the impact of the external electric field imposed by the gate electrode in CNT-bioFETs on highly charged systems such as DNAs, as supported by our recent simulations.
The significance of this work is twofold. First, it contributes to a better understanding of the inner working of carbon nanotube field-effect biosensors, which is crucially needed to support the development of these promising devices in the lab. Second, it provides the structural ensemble of the biomolecules and their interactions with the nanotube in these devices, which can serve as a starting point for a finer characterization of their effect on the carbon nanotube’s conductance at the ab initio level.
[1] S. Sorgenfrei et al. Nat Nanotechnol, 2011, 6, 126-132.
[2] D. Bouilly et al. Nano Lett, 2016, 16, 4679-4685.
[3] Y. Choi et al. Science, 2012, 335, 319-324.
[4] S. Sorgenfrei et al. Nano Lett, 2011, 11, 3739-3743.
[5] Y. Choi et al. Nano Lett, 2013, 13, 625-631.