Traditional MPL mainly contains carbon black and hydrophobic binder Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), which can guarantee water-unoccupied pathways for gas transport. The produced water can be expelled by the relatively large pores, and the water transportability is mainly controlled by the pore size and hydrophobicity. When the pore size is excessively narrow, the easily gathered water creates flooding between the CL and GDL. Large pores can solve this issue but bring the water stored in the MPL. Thus, a double MPL is developed to achieve better water management when it cannot forwardly enlarge the pore sizes under low and high humidity conditions. A commercially available hydrophobic MPL coated GDL (SGL 22BB) is the standard sample in this study. As for double MPL coated GDL, the hydrophilic layer is coated on the hydrophobic MPL coated GDL. One candidate composition uses Nafion as the hydrophilic binder, TiO2 as the hydrophilicity improvement particles, and the rest of the part is carbon black; the other way applies only Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) as the hydrophilic binder and mixes with carbon black. Both types of hydrophilic slurry are directly coated on the 22BB, and the maximum pore diameter slightly changed from 45um (SGL 22BB) to a smaller size. These very thin hydrophilic layers modify the surface properties, which can help reduce the surface contact angle and make water easier to be introduced into the hydrophobic MPL.
According to the tests, the performance of the double MPL containing PVA binder becomes worse than the Nafion-TiO2 double MPL, even than standard hydrophobic MPL. Due to the strong hydrophilicity of the PVA binder, even though a tiny amount of it is added to the top layer, water accumulation still occurs in the MPL, so the PVA binder is not suitable for the MPL property modification. The double MPL, which applied a Nafion-TiO2 hydrophilic layer, achieves lower oxygen transport resistance under high humidity conditions than the standard hydrophobic MPL. Besides, the appropriate composition of the hydrophilic contents is determined. With the increase of the TiO2 and Nafion content, the significantly enhanced hydrophilicity leads to more water absorption. However, it blocks the gas pathways, showing terrible reactants transport and high concentration over-potential. When the hydrophilic content becomes overly low, it is not enough to afford the water expelling, and water still occupies the MPL and CL interface. The thickness of the top hydrophilic MPL is another critical design parameter. A too thick hydrophilic layer can hold more water and cause a high risk of hampering reactants supply. The moderate thickness of the hydrophilic layer should be less than 5μm, which guarantees the function of the water transport and keeps away from severe water absorption.