Negating Crosstalk in High Voltage Spinel (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4)/ Graphite Full Cellsby Electrode Modifications

Monday, 10 October 2022: 10:00
Galleria 8 (The Hilton Atlanta)
P. Badami, S. E. Trask, A. U. Mane (Argonne National Laboratory), J. W. Elam (Applied Materials Division, Argonne National Laboratory), and D. P. Abraham (Argonne National Laboratory)
Since its discovery, the high-voltage spinel oxide LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 (LNMO, sg: Fd-3m) has been widely pursued as a promising cathode for next generation Li-ion batteries due to advantages that include the following: high operating voltage, excellent rate capability and low manufacturing cost (1, 2). However, the LNMO cathode when paired with graphite shows poor capacity retention and increased cell impedance due to oxidation of the organic liquid electrolyte and Mn2+ migration onto the anode (2, 3). Herein, we aim to understand the causes of poor capacity retention in LNMO/graphite full cells and systematically address those issues with various electrode modification strategies. Cycling performance of cells with carbon-nanotube (CNTs) in the LNMO electrode (LNMO-CNT), and with a thin layer of Al2O3 on the graphite electrode (Gr-Al2O3), is examined in half, full and three-electrode cell configurations. The cells with LNMO-CNT electrode show significantly lower cell impedance than cells with LNMO electrodes (without the CNT). Additionally, cells with the Al2O3-coated graphite electrode show improved capacity retention compared to cells with the uncoated graphite. Furthermore, cells containing Li4Ti5O12 anodes display the best capacity retention. We investigate and compare the physiochemical changes in electrodes and electrolyte using various diagnostic techniques; data from these experiments will be reported during the presentation.

References:

  1. M. M. Thackeray, W. I. F. David, P. G. Bruce and J. B. Goodenough, Materials Research Bulletin, 18, 461 (1983).
  2. S. Patoux, L. Daniel, C. Bourbon, H. Lignier, C. Pagano, F. Le Cras, S. Jouanneau and S. Martinet, J Power Sources, 189, 344 (2009).
  3. F. Zou, H. C. Nallan, A. Dolocan, Q. Xie, J. Y. Li, B. M. Coffey, J. G. Ekerdt and A. Manthiram, Energy Storage Materials, 43, 499 (2021).

Acknowledgements: This document has been created by UChicago Argonne, LLC, Operator of Argonne National Laboratory (“Argonne”). Argonne, a U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science laboratory, is operated under Contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.