As the released lattice oxygen stems from the near-surface region of the CAM,3 a surface-treatment with the goal of forming an O-depleted, passivating surface layer might be a reasonable approach to improve the cycling stability of LMR‑NCMs. To achieve this, an aqueous buffer-washing, as proposed by Hartmann et al., seems to be a promising approach that results in an O-depleted surface layer via a post-treatment step, which significantly reduces the amount of oxygen release during the cell formation cycles and, in turn, drastically increases the capacity retention.7, 8
To prepare an O-depleted surface layer, we exchange lithium in the near-surface region with protons by washing the material under mild conditions in an aqueous buffer (pH ~ 7-8), by which a defined amount of protons can be exchanged into the material while avoiding transition metal dissolution at high pH.8, 9 By subsequently annealing the materials at different temperatures between 120 °C and 450 °C, we are able to create O-depleted surface layers by the release of water from the CAM. As seen in our earlier publication, the thickness of the O-depleted layer is highly tunable by adjusting the buffer concentration.8
To further investigate how this post-treatment procedure impacts the electrochemical properties of LMR‑NCM, we prepared buffer-washed materials with nominally either 2 nm, 4 nm, or 9 nm thick O‑depleted surface layers, the formation of which can be followed by TGA‑MS. The impedance of electrodes prepared with these materials will be determined as a function of state-of-charge using a µ‑reference electrode, showing that the LMR‑NCM impedance is strongly affected by the thickness of the O‑depleted surface layer and by the temperature at which it was formed. For thick surface layers, XRD analysis provides insight into the structure of the formed surface layers as a function of annealing temperature.
Furthermore, we will show not only a better cycling performance of the buffer-treated material, but also better rate-performance of cells built with LMR-NCM with a stabilized O-depleted surface layer.
References
- D. Andre, S.-J. Kim, P. Lamp, S. F. Lux, F. Maglia, O. Paschos and B. Stiaszny, J. Mater. Chem. A, 3(13), 6709–6732 (2015).
- A. T. S. Freiberg, M. K. Roos, J. Wandt, R. de Vivie-Riedle and H. A. Gasteiger, J. Phys. Chem. A, 122(45), 8828–8839 (2018).
- T. Teufl, B. Strehle, P. Müller, H. A. Gasteiger and M. A. Mendez, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165(11), A2718-A2731 (2018).
- J. R. Croy, M. Balasubramanian, K. G. Gallagher and A. K. Burrell, Acc. Chem. Res., 48(11), 2813–2821 (2015).
- S. Solchenbach, G. Hong, A. T. S. Freiberg, R. Jung and H. A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc., 165(14), A3304-A3312 (2018).
- R. Jung, F. Linsenmann, R. Thomas, J. Wandt, S. Solchenbach, F. Maglia, C. Stinner, M. Tromp and H. A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc., 166(2), A378-A389 (2019).
- L. Hartmann, T. Zünd, C. H. Ching and H. A. Gasteiger, Meet. Abstr. MA2021-02 372 (2021).
- L. Hartmann, C. Ching, T. Kipfer and H. A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc., submitted.
- I. Hamam, N. Zhang, A. Liu, M. B. Johnson and J. R. Dahn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167(13), 130521 (2020).
Acknowledgement
This work is financially supported by the BASF SE Network on Electrochemistry and Battery Research.