A two-phase flow CFD simulation is performed to analyze the influence of the flow field patterns on the mass transport processes in the electrodes. Moreover, the water movement direction through the membrane as a function of the operational conditions is presented. The commercial code COMSOL Multiphysics was used to solve the transport equations through the finite element method.
In the experimental field, the water movement direction between the anodic and cathodic sides shows the capability to favor the electro-osmotic drag (EOD) or the diffusion water transport mechanism under different gas flow rates and humidities, as shown in Figure 1a. Accordingly, the results demonstrated that the EOD predominance was promoted when low symmetric flow rates (125 cm3 min-1 for anode and cathode) were used in the AEMFC. On the contrary, the water diffusion dominance appears under asymmetric flow rates between anode and cathode (125 and 250 cm3 min-1, respectively). The different tested relative humidities do not influence the water direction once the flow rates are given. The AEMFC performance was affected by the water transport mechanism, giving lower peak power densities for EOD-dominated systems (35.2 mW cm-2, in Figure 1b) than those obtained by diffusion (62.8 mW cm-2, in Figure 1c). The most suitable operating condition is for water diffusion dominance at non-saturated streams, where a decrease in performance is experienced as the flow becomes saturated (at higher humidifier temperature). A close agreement between simulation and experimental results was obtained regarding current-potential curves and water movement through the membrane dictated by electro-osmotic drag and water diffusion.
References:
[1] Electricity Market Report – January 2022, International Energy Agency, Paris (2022)
[2] Z. Yang, J. Zhang, M.C.W. Kinter-Meyer, X. Lu, D. Choi, J.P. Lemmon and J. Liu, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 3577
[3] R. Gutru, Z. Turtayeva, F. Xu, G. Maranzana, B. Vigolo and A. Desforges, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 45 (2020) 19642
[4] L. F. Castañeda, F. F. Rivera, T. Pérez and J. L. Nava, Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 16 (2019) 75.