Pulsed Electrochemical Method Enhances the Local CO2 Concentration for Efficient CO2 Reduction to CO

Tuesday, 11 October 2022: 10:20
Room 215 (The Hilton Atlanta)
Q. Xu, A. Xu, K. Chan, and B. Seger (Technical University of Denmark)
CO2 electrolysis by renewable energy is one crucial strategy to realize the closed loop of carbon cycle for the sustainable future.[1] Among various CO2 electrolysis products, the CO shows a high economical and commercial feasibility, due to its high market demands and the facile two-electron transfer reaction.[2] Zero-gap membrane electrode CO2 electrolysis is the most promising technology to produce CO at industrially relevant current densities, however, it still suffers from low CO2 utilization and serious HCO3-/CO32- crossover at large j (> 300 mA cm-2), leading to low faradic efficiency (FE) and energy efficiency (EE).[3]

Based on the baseline silver catalyst, this work will explore how the changes of CO2 supply mode (e.g. flow rate, partial pressure, etc.) influences the local CO2 concentration and local pH value on catalyst surface. By combining a series of well-designed experiments with theoretical mode calculation, we proposed that surface accessible CO2 (SA-CO2) supply on catalyst, which depends on surface OH- content and surface structure, decides the CO2 reduction reaction performance. At large current density, although the total CO2 supply is higher than the requirement for electrolysis, the local CO2 content is still limited by the in-situ generated hydroxide due to the high CO2 hydration (HCO3-/CO32-). Accordingly, a pulsed-electrochemical method was developed to improve the SA-CO2 supply by introducing a pulse-relax time to decrease the surface OH- content. When applying the same current, this baseline silver catalyst can implement a jCO of > 225 mA cm-2 with FECO > 75 % via pulsed-electrochemical method, much larger than the normal galvanostatic method with jCO of 150 mA cm-2.

Reference

[1] S. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, S.B. Scott, X. Liu, A.K. Engstfeld, S. Horch, B. Seger, I.E.L. Stephens, K. Chan, C. Hahn, J.K. Nørskov, T.F. Jaramillo, I. Chorkendorff, Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 7610-7672.

[2] B. Endrődi, E. Kecsenovity, A. Samu, T. Halmágyi, S. Rojas-Carbonell, L. Wang, Y. Yan, C. Janáky, Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, 4098-4105.

[3] W. Lee, Y. Ko, Y. Choi, S. Lee, C. Choi, Y. Hwang, B. Min, P. Strasser, H. Oh, Nano Energy, 2020, 76, 105030.