A series of in-situ electrochemical diagnostics methods to measure the mass transport resistance in PGM-fee CLs based on H2 and O2 limiting currents have been developed within the DOE-sponsored ElectroCat consortium.4,6 We will show the application of these methods, in conjunction to other well-established in-situ and ex-situ characterizations (cyclic voltammetry, impedance spectroscopy, SEM, X-ray tomography), to explain the performance trend observed in different PGM-free CLs. We examined the impact of different CL fabrication variables like the ionomer-to-catalyst (I/C) ratio, the ink solvent composition, and the ionomer equivalent weight (EW), evidencing the ones providing harsher conditions for mass transport. The results show the importance achieving optimal transport conditions by selecting a proper combination of these fabrication parameters.7,8
With the aim of improving mass transport and ionic conductivity and expanding the CL operational robustness over a broader range of operating conditions, we developed an innovative electrode architecture having differentiated and ordered domains.9 In particular, we designed a CL divided into alternated catalyst and void domains (grooves). We investigated the fabrication of the groovy CL using different methods and tested the performance under different relative humidity conditions. The results show how the groovy CL structure provides performance enhancements compared to a traditional planar CL in conditions more challenging for mass transport, e.g., at high relative humidity and for electrodes prepared with high I/C and low EW ionomer. In addition, we demonstrated that filling the grooves with a material more hydrophobic than the main catalyst domain (e.g., catalyst mixed with ionomer with high EW and low I/C, or carbon mixed with PTFE) we can largely expand the operational robustness in oversaturated conditions.
References
- D. A. Cullen et al., Nat. Energy (2021).
- D. Banham et al., Sci. Adv., 4, 1–7 (2018).
- L. Osmieri et al., Curr. Opin. Electrochem., 25, 100627 (2020).
- P. Zelenay and D. J. Myers, DOE Annual Merit Review - ElectroCat 2.0 (Electrocatalysis Consortium) (2021).
- L. Osmieri and Q. Meyer, Curr. Opin. Electrochem., 31, 100847 (2021).
- A. G. Star, G. Wang, S. Medina, S. Pylypenko, and K. C. Neyerlin, J. Power Sources, 450, 227655 (2020).
- L. Osmieri et al., Nano Energy, 75, 104943 (2020).
- G. Wang, L. Osmieri, A. G. Star, J. Pfeilsticker, and K. C. Neyerlin, J. Electrochem. Soc., 167, 044519 (2020).
- J. S. Spendelow, DOE Annual Merit Review - Accessible PGM-free Catalysts and Electrodes (2021).