Fuel electrode materials are important for achieving higher performance and durability of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC), Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell (SOEC), and Reversible Solid Oxide Cells (r-SOCs). On the other hand, the air electrode also faces performance and durability issues. For example, the diffusion of Sr ions from the air electrode materials has been reported.^{1, 2} In SOECs, if electrolysis can be performed at a thermoneutral potential balancing heat absorption by electrolysis and heat generation by the internal resistance of the electrolysis cell, hydrogen can be generated theoretically without heat supply. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the electrochemical performance and durability of the SOECs by conducting electrolysis performance tests of LSCF-based air electrodes with different preparation conditions, and electrolysis durability tests at the thermoneutral potential.

Experimental

Each test was conducted using a cell with a scandia-stabilized zirconia electrolyte (ScSZ, 200 µm thick) as a substrate. For the fuel electrode, Ni-GDC co-impregnated fuel electrode was used³. A mixture of Ni(NO₃)₂･6H₂O, Gd(NO₃)₃･6H₂O, and Ce(NO₃)₃･6H₂O was impregnated into the porous LST-GDC framework, a mixture of LST powder (La_0.1Sr_0.9TiO₃) and GDC powder (Gd_0.9Ce_0.1O₃). LSCF, (La_0.6Sr_0.4)(Co_0.2Fe_0.8)O₃, was used for the air electrodes. GDC was inserted between the LSCF layer and the electrolyte plate as a buffer layer. In fabricating air electrodes, four types of air electrodes were applied, at shown in Table 1. For the electrochemical measurements of the air electrodes, Pt reference electrode was attached to the electrolyte on the fuel electrode side, and the voltage terminals of the electrochemical measurement system were connected between the reference electrode and the air electrode to measure air electrode voltage.

In the performance tests, the voltage (potential) and impedance of the air electrode were measured at operating temperatures of 800°C, 750°C, and 700°C. In the durability tests, the air electrode was maintained at thermoneutral potentials at 800°C and 700°C (1.286 V and 1.283 V, respectively), and the voltage and impedance of the air electrodes were measured before and after the durability tests to evaluate the degradation of the air electrodes.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the air electrode voltage obtained from the performance tests at each operating temperature for the four types of air electrodes shown in Table 1. First, regarding the dependence of the electrolysis performance on operating temperature, an increase in air electrode voltage (degradation of the air electrode) was found at 800°C.The increase in air electrode voltage with current density was almost linear, but at lower operating temperatures, the increase in air electrode voltage at lower current densities becomes larger. In other words, the I-V curve was rather ohmic at 800°C, but non-ohmic at 700°C.

Figure 2 shows the results of an 80-hour durability test at different temperatures. The current density of the cell corresponding to the thermoneutral potential was -0.298 Acm^-2 when operated at 800°C and -0.018 Acm^-2 when operated at 700°C.The degradation rate was calculated from the difference in air electrode voltage before and after the performance and durability test at these current densities: 0.172% at 800°C and 0.792% at 700℃. The degradation rate increased as the operating temperature decreased in the SOEC mode, despite the low current density. Microstructural observation of the air electrode after the durability test showed that Sr diffused to the LSCF/GDC interface similar to SOFCs mode⁴, and that the diffusion of Sr was accelerated at 700°C. In addition, Co diffusion was also observed. Such diffusion may occur during LSCF firing process and/or during SOEC operation. More detailed investigation is in progress.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported in part by NEDO (New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization). We thank all parties involved.

References

(1) V. Subotić, S. Futamura, G. F. Harrington, J. Matsuda, K. Natsukoshi, and K. Sasaki, J. Power Sources, 492, 229600 (2021).

(2) S. P. Simner, M. D. Anderson, M. H. Engelhard, and J. W. Stevenson, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 9 A478 (2006).

(3) K. Natsukoshi, K. Miyara, Y. Tachikawa, J. Matsuda, S. Taniguchi, G. F. Harrington, and K. Sasaki, ECS Trans., 03, 203 (2021).

(4) S. Kanae, Y. Toyofuku, T. Kawabata, Y. Inoue, T. Daio, J. Matsuda, J,-T. Chou, Y. Shiratori, S. Taniguchi, and K. Sasaki, ECS Trans., 68, 2463 (2015).