This work deals with the investigation of the influence of the operating parameters in the drive cycle as an important operating mode on the aging of the cathode catalyst layer in the MEA. According to the state of the art, nanoparticulate platinum supported on carbon (Pt/C) is usually used as the cathode catalyst. The degradation of Pt/C has been intensively studied in recent years. Platinum dissolution and Pt agglomeration are discussed as the main causes of Pt/C degradation during PEMFC operation. [2, 3]
Studies have shown that the dissolution rate generally increases with potential and can accelerate under potentiodynamic conditions. [1] Dissolution of Pt from the catalyst, transport of Pt ions through the electrode, and precipitation of Pt in the membrane, possibly due to reduction of Pt ions by the H2 crossover from the anode can be associated with the loss of cathode electrochemical surface area (ECSA) and thus irreversible performance loss. [4]
The primary objective of this work is to investigate the influence of different operating parameters such as temperature and potential range on the degradation rate of the cathode using an accelerated stress test (AST) which was developed to simulate an analogous to real drive cycle operation of a PEM fuel cell in a vehicle.
A secondary objective is to evaluate the AST itself in order to determinate its capability of fuel cell lifetime prediction. For that the transferability of the observed degradation rates are to be evaluated on different integration levels such as single-cell PEM test bench and short-stack multi-cell test bench. As a measure to evaluate the transferability of the accelerated stress tests, the loss of electrochemical active surface area (ECSA) serves as an indirect measure of catalyst degradation and the resulting Pt particle size distribution which is determined by TEM serves as a direct measure. The derivation of acceleration factors for the lifetime tests of the different integration levels would allow an early estimation of the lifetime, this way test time and cost could be significantly saved in the evaluation of new materials.
References
[1] Borup, R. L., Davey, J. R., Garzon, F. H., Wood, D. L., and Inbody, M. A. 2006. PEM fuel cell electrocatalyst durability measurements. Journal of Power Sources 163, 1, 76–81.
[2] Mahlon S. Wilson, Fernando H. Garzon, Kurt E. Sickafus, and Shimshon Gottesfeld. Surface Area Loss of Supported Platinum in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells. In J. Electrochem. Soc., 2872–2877.
[3] Yu, X. and Ye, S. 2007. Recent advances in activity and durability enhancement of Pt/C catalytic cathode in PEMFC Part II: Degradation mechanism and durability enhancement of carbon supported platinum catalyst. Journal of Power Sources 172, 1, 145–154.
[4] Ahluwalia, R. K., Arisetty, S., Wang, X., Wang, X., Subbaraman, R., Ball, S. C., DeCrane, S., and Myers, D. J. 2013. Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Platinum Dissolution from Carbon-Supported Electrocatalysts in Aqueous Media under Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic Conditions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 160, 4, F447-F455.