Single cell studies with 25-cm2 active area are performed using catalyst-coated Nafion® XL membranes (Ion Power Inc.) and SGL-22 BB gas diffusion layers (GDLs) as membrane electrode assembly (MEA) materials and 7-channel serpentine flow field. An S++® current scan shunt (CSS) sensor plate (25-cm2) with 100 current and 25 temperature measurement segments is utilized for current and temperature mapping, respectively. The MEAs are subjected to DOE’s square-wave cycling (0.6 to 0.95 V vs. RHE), triangular-wave cycling (1 to 1.5 V vs. RHE), and a sequence of square-wave cycling followed by triangular-wave cycling. Complete in-situ electrochemical characterization and post-mortem ex-situ diagnostics such as micro-X-ray diffraction (micro-XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are used to obtain particle size distribution and spatial degradation profiles. Results indicate a strong dependence of current distributions on localized catalyst layer degradation. For example, MEA with relatively uniform current distributions at the beginning-of-life (BOL) in Figure 1 exhibits severe mass transport limitations (significantly higher current at the air inlet than the outlet) at EOL when subjected to triangular-wave carbon corrosion AST. Furthermore, an increase of ~1.5x in Tafel slope is observed for the aged sample at EOL, highlighting increased transport losses. These mass transport losses are believed to originate from loss of catalyst layer porosity and subsequent compaction due to carbon support corrosion [2].
This work seeks to achieve a greater understanding of the functional dependence between catalyst growth and carbon corrosion and observed local performance.
References:
[1] S. Stariha et al., “Recent Advances in Catalyst Accelerated Stress Tests for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 165, no. 7, pp. F492–F501, 2018, doi: 10.1149/2.0881807jes.
[2] N. Macauley et al., “Carbon Corrosion in PEM Fuel Cells and the Development of Accelerated Stress Tests,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 165, no. 6, pp. F3148–F3160, 2018, doi: 10.1149/2.0061806jes.
[3] L. Cheng et al., “Mapping of Heterogeneous Catalyst Degradation in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” Adv. Energy Mater., vol. 2000623, pp. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1002/aenm.202000623.
[4] P. Sharma et al., “Influence of Flow Rate on Catalyst Layer Degradation in Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells,” {ECS} Meet. Abstr., vol. {MA}2020-0, no. 36, p. 2345, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1149/ma2020-02362345mtgabs.
[5] K. Khedekar et al., “Probing Heterogeneous Degradation of Catalyst in PEM Fuel Cells under Realistic Automotive Conditions with Multi-Modal Techniques,” Adv. Energy Mater., 2021, doi: 10.1002/aenm.202101794.