614
A Novel Electrolyte Additive for High-Voltage LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4 Positive Electrode

Friday, 13 June 2014
Cernobbio Wing (Villa Erba)
T. J. Lee, T. Yoon, J. Jung, J. Lee, O. B. Chae (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University), J. H. Ryu (Graduate School of Knowledge-based Technology and Energy, Korea Polytechnic University), and S. M. Oh (Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Seoul National University)
  The Ni-doped manganese spinel (LiNi0.5Mn1.5O4, LNMO) has been projected as a high-voltage positive electrode for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). The high working voltage (> 4.6 V vs. Li/Li+) with an outstanding structural stability must be beneficial with respect to energy density and cycle life, but this advantage is offset by the instability of cell constituents. For instance, the commonly used electrolytes are decomposed and surface films deposit.1 Once surface films deposit, polarization increases to eventually cause a capacity fading.2,3

  In order to mitigate the electrolyte decomposition/film growth, LNMO electrode should be passivated. A simple approach is the addition of film-forming agents, which decompose to form a protective layer to suppress additional electrolyte decomposition.

  As a film-forming agent for LNMO electrodes, tris(pentafluorophenyl)silane (TPFPS) was tested in this work. Addition of TPFPS (0.1 wt. %) into the conventional electrolyte (1.3 M LiPF6in EC:EMC:DEC = 3:2:5 in vol. ratio) improves both the cycle performance and coulombic efficiency at 25°C and 60°C (Fig. 1a and 1b). TPFPS is oxidatively decomposed (< 4.7 V) prior to the electrolyte (Fig. 1c). The surface film derived from the additive shows a good passivating ability. The film growth and polarization increase are not serious. In contrast, the surface film derived from the additive-free electrolyte is poorly passivating. Surface film steadily grows due to continued electrolyte decomposition, which eventually leads to capacity fading due to ever-increasing electrode polarization (Fig. 1d). 


References

1. J. B. Goodenough and Y. Kim, Journal of Power Sources196, 6688 (2011).

2. D. Aurbach, B. Markovsky, Y. Talyossef, G. Salitra, H.-J. Kim and S. Choi, Journal of Power Sources162, 780 (2006).

3. T. Yoon, S. Park, J. Mun, J. H. Ryu, W. Choi, Y.-S. Kang, J.-H. Park and S. M. Oh, Journal of Power Sources215, 312 (2012).


Fig. 1. Cycle performance and coulombic efficiency at 25°C (a) and 60°C (b). The differential capacity plot in the 1stcharging (c) and electrochemical impedance data obtained after 200 cycles (d).