The lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI) salt has been suggested as a possible replacement for LiPF6due to an improved thermal stability, high ionic conductivities and electrochemical stabilities in LIB electrolytes [2,3]. However, some contradictory results exist with respect to its promising thermal stability and non-corrosiveness [4,5].
We have investigated three commercial LiFSI salts and compared their properties with focus on thermal stability and phase transitions – including a vibrational spectroscopy based assessment of salt purity and decomposition products [6]. The salts were found to differ significantly in their thermal stabilities as determined by both dynamic and isothermal TGA. The FT-IR spectra of the salts are close to identical, but several additional bands were identified in the Raman spectra of the least stable salt. The latter allows for a discussion of the origin and role of salt impurities for the observed thermal (in-)stability. Furthermore, by adding each salt to the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium FSI (EMIFSI), Li0.1EMI0.9FSI electrolytes were obtained. Galvanostatic cycling and linear sweep voltammetry were both performed to elucidate the influence of the impurities on the electrochemical performance.
[1] S.F. Lux, I.T. Lucas, E. Pollak, S. Passerini, M. Winter, R. Kostecki, Electrochem. Commun. 14 (2012) 47.
[2] H.-B. Han et al.J. Power Sources 196 (2011) 3623.
[3] L. Li, S. Zhou, H. Han, H. Li, J. Nie, M. Armand, Z. Zhou, X. Huang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 158 (2011) A74.
[4] K. Kubota, T. Nohira, T. Goto, R. Hagiwara, Electrochem. Commun. 10 (2008) 1886.
[5] A. Abouimrane, J. Ding, I.J. Davidson, J. Power Sources 189 (2009) 693.
[6] M. Kerner, N. Plylahan, J. Scheers, P. Johansson, submitted
Figure 1: The thermal stabilities of three commercial LiFSI salts.