In this study, we have compared the electrochemical performance of Cu2S electrodes in various kinds of carbonate-based electrolyte and the results show that the cyclic carbonate-based electrolyte is a major factor contributing the limited stability. Experiments were done by using commercially available copper sulfides as the electrode material. Some linear carbonate (DMC, EMC) and cyclic carbonate (FEC, PC, VC, EC) were tested as the electrolytes in different compositions. Our results show that the capacity of the Cu2S electrode fades quickly in cyclic carbonate-based electrolytes, but shows a much better electrochemical performance in linear carbonate-based electrolytes. In EMC (1 M LiPF6), it can show a discharge-capacity of 242.8 mAhg-1 with coulombic efficiency of 99.6% after 50 cycles. (As shown in Figure 1 and Table 1)
Our study firstly finds that the copper sulfides electrodes can obtain excellent electrochemical performance in carbonate-based electrolyte without any special nanostructure. And the theoretical work was used to reveal the real reason of the negative effect of cyclic carbonate-based electrolyte for the first time. (As shown in Figure 2 and Table 2). From the data as shown in Figure 2 and Table 2, we can draw a conclusion that it is more difficult for nucleophilic attack reaction on linear-based carbonate due to the change of the Gibbs free energies for reaction (b) is a positive value. At the same time, the total energy of the cyclic carbonate molecules is higher than the related energies of linear carbonate molecules which also show that the cyclic carbonate molecules are more unstable. All these indicate that the electrolyte composed of cyclic structure (take FEC, PC, VC and EC for example) may easily react with nucleophilic anions and which is related to the negative effects on the electrochemical performance of copper sulfides.
On the basis of the electrochemical study, we can conclude that there is a negative effect of cyclic carbonate-based electrolyte on the electrochemical performance of copper sulfide electrodes. Additional theoretical work for this study reveals the real reason of the negative effect of cyclic carbonate-based electrolyte for the first time.
Fig. 1 (a) Discharge–charge profiles of the Cu2S electrode at first cycle in different electrolyte, (b) cycle performance of the Cu2S electrode in different electrolyte, all the experiments are tested between 1.0 and 3.0 V vs. Li/Li+ at a rate of 0.5 C (1 C = 335 mAh g-1).
Table. 1 The first columbic efficiency and the capacity retention of Cu2S electrode in various composition of electrolytes at room temperature.
Compsition of electrolytes |
The first columbic efficiency |
capacity retention |
||
10th |
20th |
50th |
||
1 M LiPF6 in DMC |
92.6% |
86.0% |
77.3% |
55.5% |
1 M LiPF6 in EMC |
95.2% |
95.4% |
88.4% |
76.5% |
1 M LiPF6 in FEC |
79.0% |
1.3% |
0.9% |
0.3% |
1 M LiPF6 in PC |
91.5% |
5.8% |
1.9% |
1.1% |
1 M LiPF6 in VC |
78.4% |
1.1% |
0.9% |
0.8% |
1 M LiPF6 in EC |
74.2% |
1.3% |
0.8% |
0.6% |
Fig. 2 Proposed Reactions between S42- and Carbonates.
Species |
EC |
DMC |
S42- |
1 |
2 |
°÷G (a) |
°÷G (b) |
G(Hartree/Particle) |
-342.35 |
-343.55 |
-1592.68 |
-1935.09 |
-1935.67 |
-0.05 |
0.56 |
Table. 2 Gibbs free energies of the solvents and the change of the Gibbs free energies for reaction.