Vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) is one of the most common cathode materials in the field of Li batteries and has a few advantages when used as an additive in sulfur cathodes. It is an electrochemically active material in the cut-off voltage range from 1.5 to 4 V, which closely matches that for sulfur cathodes (from 1.5 to 3 V), and it also positively contributes to the capacity of sulfur cathodes. In this study, S/Carbon/porousV2O5 nanocomposites were prepared by a novel synthesis route and their physical and electrochemical properties were further investigated.
Porous V2O5 particles were firstly prepared by spray pyrolysis (SP) with NH4NO3 additive. The pore structure of obtained samples were analyzed by N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm measurements. The V2O5 particles with pore size less than 100 nm could be prepared at 500 ºC by SP with a 0.272 mol L-1 NH4NO3 additive, and the porous V2O5 electrode exhibited a first discharge capacity of 400 mAh g-1 at 20 mA g-1.
The as-prepared porous V2O5 were packed with acetylene black and S at a targeted ration in a closed reactor. The reactor was heated at different temperatures ranging from 120 to 200 ºC. The effect of S content, heating temperature and heating time were investigated systematically.
Figure 1 shows the cycle performance of the S/C/porous V2O5 composite electrode at a charge-discharge rate of 100 mA g-1. The cycle performance of the S/C composite electrode is also shown in the figure as a comparison. The S/C/porous V2O5 composite electrode exhibits a discharge capacity of 666 mAh g-1 at 50th cycles, while the S/C composite electrode shows a discharge capacity of 379 mAh g-1 at 50th cycles . As seen from this fact, the S/C/porous V2O5 composite electrode shows larger discharge capacities and better cycle performance than the S/C composite electrode. This fact indicate that the V2O5 additive to the S/C composite electrode leads to enhance its electrochemical performance.
References
[1] Bruce et. al., Nat. Mater. 11 (2012), 19–29.
[2] Armand et. al., Nature, 451 (2008), 652–657.
[3] Manthiram et. al., Chem. Rev. 114 (2014), 11751–11787.