Impact of Spark Plasma Sintering Conditions on Ionic Conductivity in La1.95Sr0.05Zr2O7-δ Electrolyte Material for Intermediate Temperature SOFCs

Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) have attracted much attention as potential energy source. Their high operating temperatures (800°C-1000°C) can lead to thermal, mechanical and chemical problems such as densification of electrodes or formation of an insulating layer at the electrode/electrolyte interface by interdiffusion [1-2]. To overcome these drawbacks, the Proton Ceramic Fuel Cell  (PCFC) technology was developed. This technology, where the electrolyte is an H⁺ ion conductor in the form of ceramic oxide material, exhibits the intrinsic benefits of proton conduction in Polymer Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFC) and the advantages of the SOFC technologies. Since the discovery of high temperature protonic conductivity in cerates [3-4], many investigations about pyrochlore-type proton conductors are performed [5-6]. These systems are characterized by mixed valence oxides (often rare earth) and anion vacancies as primary lattice defects. Under wet atmosphere, the proton conduction occurs via the hydration of oxygen vacancies after the material is exposed to a vapour-containing atmosphere according to the following equation 1 (inserted as part of the image file).        

The conventional route for the preparation of lanthanum zirconate pyrochlore (LSZO) via solid-state reactions requires multiple milling and high temperature calcination steps. Also, this method leads generally to an heterogeneity of the final product, whereas wet chemical route, which consists of mixing precursors in a solution, could improve compositional homogeneity and stoichiometry. In this work, we have synthesized nano-sized La_1,95Sr_0,05Zr₂O_7-d using an oxalic co-precipitation method. As impedance spectroscopy measurements require high densification, only spark plasma sintering (SPS) gives dense materials. Other sintering processes such as hot isostatic pressing induce a segregation of strontium at the surface of the pellet [7], and thereby decrease proton conductivities.

LSZO powders were densified using SPS apparatus under different sintering conditions: holding time, temperature and pressure. To maintain the same compacity for different grain sizes, starting powder materials were calcined at different temperatures in order to increase of the particle size. Thus several pellets with either different relative densities or grain sizes were obtained. The grain size increases with increasing of the sintering temperature. The proton conductivity behavior of those pellets was investigated by AC impedance spectroscopy under dry and wet atmospheres. The data were measured in the frequency range 0.1Hz – 6 MHz (Materials mates M2-7260 impedance analyzer) at intermediate temperatures 400-600°C. In order to verify the dependence of total resistance and capacitance, a DC-bias (U_DC from 0 to 1V) was applied. The Nyquist diagrams were modeled by equivalent circuits based on resistors and constant phase elements (CPEs).  The ionic conductivities are clearly dependent on grain sizes (see Figure 1). In order to elucidate this dependence, it will be necessary to assess a porosity correction equation. The activation energies, calculated using the Arrhenius equation, increase with increasing grain sizes. The proton conductivities are higher in wet atmosphere than dry atmosphere. For example, the ionic conductivities of 120 nm-LSZO are 2.45 × 10^-5 S.cm^-1 and 3.30 × 10^-5 S.cm^-1 under dry and wet atmosphere (5% H₂O) at 600°C, respectively.

Figure 1 - Nyquist plots of impedance spectra for LSZO with different particle sizes at 600°C 

References

[1]       S.C. Singhal, Solid State Ion. 135 (2000) 305.

[2]       C. Xia, W. Rauch, F. Chen, M. Liu, Solid State Ion. 149 (2002) 11.

[3]       F. Chen, O.T. Sørensen, G. Meng, D. Peng, J. Mater. Chem. 7 (1997) 481.

[4]       H. Iwahara, H. Uchida, K. Ono, K. Ogaki, J. Electrochem. Soc. 135 (1988) 529.

[5]       K.E.J. Eurenius, E. Ahlberg, C.S. Knee, Dalton Trans. 40 (2011) 3946.

[6]       T. Shimura, M. Komori, H. Iwahara, Solid State Ion. 86–88, Part 1 (1996) 685.

[7]       D. Huo, D. Gosset, G. Baldinozzi, D. Siméone, H. Khodja, B. Villeroy, S. Surblé, Solid State Ion. (submitted).