262
Isotopically Labeled Carbon and Water to Deconvolute CO2 Evolution in Li-Batteries by on-Line Electrochemical Mass Spectrometry
In this work we employ on-line electrochemical mass spectrometry (OEMS) to analyze the gas evolution in battery test cells over a wide electrode potential window (2 - 6 V vs. Li/Li+). CO2 is a known degradation product, but it can be either due to the electrochemical oxidation of the electrolyte or the carbon in the cathode through the reaction:
C + 2H2O → CO2 + 4H+ + 4e- (1)
In order to deconvolute these two processes, isotopically labeled 13C carbon (99 atom% 13C, Sigma-Aldrich) is used to prepare a model electrode that consists exclusively of 13C carbon. This allows to assign the evolved CO2 isotopes to either the degradation of the electrode or the electrolyte. In the context of Li-O2 batteries, this strategy was used to analyze the formation of Li2CO3 in presence of Li2O2 [4].
Furthermore, the effect of water on the degradation of carbon and electrolyte is investigated. By adding a defined amount of water (4000 ppm) to the electrolyte one can mimic the effect of trace water that could unintentionally be introduced to the cell through the active materials. Joho et. al. studied the irreversible charge loss due to water reduction in graphite based Li-ion cells, however no correlation between water content and cycling stability could be found [5]. To clarify whether water promotes exclusively the degradation of either the carbon electrode or the electrolyte or the degradation of both components, isotopically labeled 18O-water (98 atom% 18O, Sercon) is added to the electrolyte.
Figure 1 features a linear potential sweep and the corresponding gas evolution in OEMS for a 13C carbon cathode and LP30 electrolyte containing 4000 ppm H216O. An evolution of the 13C16O2 isotope of carbon dioxide is detected together with 12C16O2 at potentials of 4.6 V vs. Li/Li+. The first isotope is likely to originate from the electrode corrosion, while the latter could result from the oxidation of the electrolyte. The signals at channels 48 and 49, corresponding to the 12C18O2 and 13C18O2 isotopes, respectively are not detected, since this system contains no labeled 18O-water.
References:
[1] N. Tsiouvaras, S. Meini, I. Buchberger, and H. A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc., 160, A471 (2013).
[2] B. D. McCloskey, D. S. Bethune, R.M. Shelby, G. Girishkumar, and A. C. Luntz, J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2, 1161 (2011).
[3] R. Bernhard, S. Meini, and H. A. Gasteiger, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161, A497 (2014).
[4] M. M. O. Thotiyl, S. A. Freunberger, P. Zhangquan, P. G. Bruce, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135, 494 (2013).
[5] F. Joho, B. Rykart, R. Imhof, P. Novák, M. E. Spahr, A. Monnier, J. of Power Sources., 81-82, 243 (1999).
Acknowledgment:
Support of BASF SE in the framework of its scientific network on electrochemistry and batteries is acknowledged by TUM.