The Effect of Self-Discharge on the Performance of Symmetric Electric Double Layer Capacitors: Insights from Mathematical Modeling and Simulation
Motivated by this knowledge gap, we have developed a generalized mathematical model of symmetric electric double layer capacitors (EDLCs) that incorporates the self-discharge effect during charging and discharging of the electrochemical device. This model is generic and applies to any symmetric EDLC using specific self-discharge mechanism or a combination of different self-discharge mechanisms applicable in EDLCs. Analysis and simulations were carried out on the model with self-discharge effects and the model without self-discharge. It was found from the analysis that the model with self-discharge took longer time to charge the capacitor to the designed voltage than the model without self-discharge. Also, the model with self-discharge discharges the stored energy faster than the model without self-discharges. The self-discharge current Iselfdis and energy loss due to self-discharge Eselfdis during charge and discharge processes of the capacitor with electrode’s effective conductivity α1=0.05 S/cm are 0.786 A and 9.73 Wh, respectively. A fully charged capacitor with self-discharge and electrodes effective conductivity α1=0.05 S/cm on storage takes 7.2 days for the capacitors to be fully discharged by self-discharge process. The energy efficiency of the first and second charge–discharge cycle and for the capacitor with self-discharge and with electrodes effective conductivity α1=0.05 S/cm are 64.62 % and 64.63 % while those for same capacitor without self-discharge are 84.241 % and 84.244 %, respectively.
In summary, we prove from our models that the charging, discharging and storage time of the symmetric ECs significantly depend on self-discharge. In this presentation, we will show that the effect of self-discharge is so enormous to be ignored as exemplified in the presentations, where the potential profile φne/pe for the electrodes with and without self-discharge effect as a function of position after charging and discharging by constant current with different parameters of α1 and α2.
. C. Lin, J. A. Ritter, B. N. Popov, and R. E. White, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146, 3168 (1999).
 V. Srinivasan and J. W. Weidner, J. Electrochem. Soc., 146, 1650 (1999).
 C. Lin, B. N. Popov, and H. J. Ploehn, J. Electrochem. Soc., 149, A167 (2002).
 S. A. Kazaryan, S. N. Razumov, S. V. Litvinenko, G. G. Kharisov, and V. I. Kogan, J. Electrochem. Soc., 153, A1655 (2006).
 J. A. Stasera, and J. W. Weidner, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161 (8) E3267-E3275 (2014).
 Verbrugge, M.W. and Liub P., J. Electrochem Soc., 152 (5) (2005) D79-D87.
 V. Srinivasan, J. W. Weidner, and R. E. White, J. Solid State Electrochem., 4, 367 (2000).
 K. Somasundaram, E. Birgersson, and A. S. Mujumdar, J. Electrochem. Soc., 158, A1220 (2011).
 G. Sikha, R. E. White, and B. N. Popov, J. Electrochem. Soc., 152, A1682 (2005).
 B. Pillay and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc., 143, 1806 (1996).
 D. Fan and R. E. White, J. Electrochem. Soc., 138, 2952 (1991).
 H. Kim, B. N. Popov, and R. E. White, J. Electrochem. Soc., 150 (9) (2003) A1153-A1160.