425
Effect of Cation Structure Modification of Ionic Liquids for Lithium-Ion Batteries
In recent years, many approaches have been pursued to optimize (1-butyl-1-methylprrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide (Pyr14TFSI)) based electrolyte to obtain a suitable electrolyte formulation for application in lithium-ion batteries[4-5]. More attention has been paid to accommodate the incompatibility with carbon anodes, such as mixture use of ILs and organic solvents[1] , addition of certain amount of SEI additives (e.g. VC[6-7], ClEC[7-8], FEC and ES[6-7]) and substitution of conductive salts[4-5]. The basic strategy is to form an ideal surface layer on graphite[4], which can offer sufficient ability to prevent the intercalation of the cation of ILs and avoid a continuous electrolyte decomposition of electrolyte. In order to enrich the knowledge of the ionic liquid performance in lithium ion batteries, the concept of this work is set on IL with organic functional group modifications. The structure medication is considered to be an easy way for synthesis approaching and favorable for fast change of physical and chemical properties.
In this work, we synthesized a series of ester group modified ILs from Pyr14TFSI, based on our computational screening results. The synthesized ILs methyl-methylcarboxymethyl prrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide (MMMPyrTFSI)) and methyl-propylcarboxymethyl prrolidinium bis(trifluoromethane-sulfonyl)imide (MPMPyrTFSI)) show high oxidation stability (ca 5.4 V vs Li/Li+). TGA measurements show that modified ILs are thermally stable above 300oC. Moreover, electrolytes based either on MMMPyrTFSI or MPMPyrTFSI show excellent electrochemical performance in Li/LiFePO4cells, display a stable reversible capacity of 150 mAh/g at 1C and 110 mAh/g at higher rate of 5C. For the graphite anode, MPMPyrTFSI based electrolyte shows stable capacity of 330 mAh/g at 0.1C with an efficiency of 99% during the 100 cycles. These interesting results illustrate cation modification of ILs as an effective way for improved performance of ILs in lithium-ion batteries.
References
[1]R. A. Di Leo, A. C. Marschilok, K. J. Takeuchi, E. S. Takeuchi, Electrochimica Acta 2013, 109, 27-32.
[2]V. Borgel, E. Markevich, D. Aurbach, G. Semrau, M. Schmidt, Journal of Power Sources 2009, 189, 331-336.
[3]S. F. Lux, M. Schmuck, G. B. Appetecchi, S. Passerini, M. Winter, A. Balducci, Journal of Power Sources 2009, 192, 606-611.
[4]M. Nádherná, J. Reiter, J. Moškon, R. Dominko, Journal of Power Sources 2011, 196, 7700-7706.
[5]G. B. Appetecchi, M. Montanino, A. Balducci, S. F. Lux, M. Winterb, S. Passerini, Journal of Power Sources 2009, 192, 599-605.
[6]M. Holzapfel, C. Jost, A. Prodi-Schwab, F. Krumeich, A. Würsig, H. Buqa, P. Novák, Carbon 2005, 43, 1488-1498.
[7]H. Zheng, K. Jiang, T. Abe, Z. Ogumi, Carbon 2006, 44, 203-210.
[8]H. Zheng, B. Li, Y. Fu, T. Abe, Z. Ogumi, Electrochimica Acta 2006, 52, 1556-1562.