25 Mg NMR Studies of Mg-Ion Battery Materials

Tuesday, October 13, 2015
West Hall 1 (Phoenix Convention Center)
H. Wang, N. Sa (Argonne National Lab), D. L. Proffit (Argonne National Laboratory), P. Senguttuvan (Joint Center for Energy Storage Research), C. Kim (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory), J. Cabana (JCESR at University of Illinois at Chicago), K. Poeppelmeier (Northwestern University), T. L. Kinnibrugh (Argonne National Laboratory), K. W. Chapman (NECCES at Argonne National Laboratory), A. K. Burrell (Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR)), J. T. Vaughey (Argonne National Laboratory), and B. Key (Argonne National Laboratory, Joint Center for Energy Storage Research)
Multivalent-ion chemistries such as Mg-ion are emerging as alternative battery systems to Li-ion. Current Mg-ion chemistries are limited to relatively low voltages and relatively low reversible specific capacities (1-2). Recent research on potential high voltage Mg-ion cathode materials and alternative anode materials such as transition metal oxides and metal alloys have highlighted the urgent need to understand structure activity relationships and insertion/intercalation phenomenon for development of such systems (3). Solid state NMR is a powerful tool to investigate local structure and insertion/intercalation phenomena, particularly for batteries as shown for Li-ion chemistries with 6Li and 7Li NMR (4, 5). However, the low natural abundance (10%) of the NMR active Mg isotope (25Mg), highly quadrupolar nuclear spin of 25Mg (spin 5/2) and very low gyromagnetic ratio (i.e 30.6 MHz Larmor frequency relative to 1H = 500 MHz) limits the effective use of 25Mg NMR for solid Mg-ion battery materials (6). In this work, despite the challenges of 25Mg NMR, our recent efforts to characterize Mg environments in cathode materials such as MgMn2O4 spinels, MgV2O5, in anode materials such as h-TiO2 and Mg alloys will be presented. Chemical magnesiation using dibutylmagnesium and preliminary electrochemical (de)magnesiation and the structural changes induced will be discussed. The results will summarize the effectiveness of the method in distinguishing side reactions or undesirable conversion reactions, including amorphous phases, from intercalation phenomenon.

1. D. Aurbach, Z. Lu, A. Schechter, Y. Gofer, H. Gizbar, R. Turgeman, Y. Cohen, M. Moshkovich, and E. Levi, Nature, 407 (6805), 724-727 (2000).

2. H. D. Yoo, I. Shterenberg, Y. Gofer, G. Gershinsky, N. Pour, and D. Aurbach, Energ Environ Sci, 6 (8), 2265-2279 (2013).

3. Magnesium Batteries 1 and 2, 224th Electrochemical Society Meeting, San Francisco CA, 2013

4. C. P. Grey and N. Dupre, Chem. Rev. (Washington, DC, U. S.), 104, 4493 (2004).

5. B. Key, R. Bhattacharyya, M. Morcrette, V. Seznec, J. M. Tarascon and C. P. Grey, Journal of the American Chemical Society, 131, 9239 (2009).

6. R. Dupree and M. E. Smith, Journal of the Chemical Society-Chemical Communications, 1483 (1988).