In the current study, we find that an additional product, acetaldehyde, is formed on OD-Cu during CO evolution, and that it is a intermediate for ethanol formation. [5] It is present at a moderate Faradaic efficiency of ~5% at -0.3 V vs. RHE. Although Hori et al. previously discovered it as a product from CO reduction on polycrystalline copper electrodes,[6] acetaldehyde has not been reported for this reaction on OD-Cu. The reason that it was previously overlooked is related to product analysis. It is not detectable using routine nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, the method-of-choice for many groups in the field. When using headspace-gas chromatography, however, it can be readily identified. We hypothesise that the reason for this discrepancy is that acetaldehyde is unstable in alkaline solutions, such as the 0.1 M KOH (pH 13) used as electrolyte for these measurements. It agglomerates and polymerizes, leading to line broadening in NMR spectra, and precipitates out of solution, with these effects combining to reduce the signal drastically. Our density functional theory calculations support the notion that acetaldehyde is an intermediate.
The knowledge that ethanol is produced through acetaldehyde provides us with valuable mechanistic information. Moreover, acetaldehyde is a valuable chemical in its own right. Future work will aim to determine how the catalyst can be engineered to exclusively produce acetaldehyde or ethanol at high kinetic rates with minimal potential losses.
References
[1] A. Goeppert, M. Czaun, J. P. Jones, G. K. Surya Prakash, G. A. Olah, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7995–8048.
[2] W. Tang, A. A. Peterson, A. S. Varela, Z. P. Jovanov, L. Bech, W. J. Durand, S. Dahl, J. K. Nørskov, I. Chorkendorff, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 76–81.
[3] C. W. Li, M. W. Kanan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 7231–7234.
[4] C. W. Li, J. Ciston, M. W. Kanan, Nature 2014, 508, 504–507.
[5] E. Bertheussen, A. Verdaguer-Casadevall, D. Ravasio, J. H. Montoya, C. Roy, D. B. Trimarco, S. Meier, J. Wendland, J. K. Nørskov, I. E. L. Stephens, et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, Accepted.
[6] Y. Hori, R. Takahashi, Y. Yoshinami, A. Murata, J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 7075–7081.