LMR-NMC cathode materials are based on the composite ‘layered-layered’ xLi2MnO3 ·(1-x)LiMO2 (M=Mn, Co, Ni) or Li1+yM1-yO2 (M =Co, Mn, Ni) structure which is an integration of layered LiMO2 (M= Co, Mn, Ni) with a hexagonal unit cell of R-3 m space group and layered Li2MnO3 with a monoclinic unit cell of C2/m space group [1-3]. However, these types of materials are plagued by a series of problems that limit their commercialization. When the LMR-NMC is charged to high potentials (> 4.4 V vs Li), the Li2MnO3 component is activated by the simultaneous removal of lithium and oxygen from the structure. This activation leads to high first-cycle irreversible capacity and voltage fade [4,5]. Additionally, these materials exhibit a low rate capability and capacity fade [6,7]. These problems are closely related to the structure, stoichiometry, and morphology which are greatly influenced by the synthesis methods and conditions [8,9]. Therefore, there is a need for continued investigation of synthesis methods to be able to overcome the hurdles associated with this material.
In this work, Li1.2Mn0.52Co0.13Ni0.13Al0.02O2 (LMNCA) cathode was successfully prepared using combustion method with urea and ethylene glycol (EG) as fuels. The effect of the fuel on the physical (FE-SEM, BET), structural (PXRD) and electrochemical (CV, GC, and EIS) properties of the samples were evaluated. The results revealed that the LMNCA from urea (LMNCA-urea) sample exhibits a highly ordered crystalline ‘layered-layered’ structure, narrow particle size distribution and high surface area compared to LMNCA from EG (LMNCA-EG). The LMNCA-urea resulted in enhanced capacity, cycle performance, and rate capability. This presentation will discuss in detail the different physical and electrochemical properties of the LMNCA due to the use of urea and EG as combustion fuels.
References
[1] M.M. Thackeray, C.S. Johnson, J.T. Vaughey, N. Li, S.A. Hackney, Journal of Materials Chemistry, 15 (2005) 2257-2267.
[2] M.M. Thackeray, S. Kang, C.S. Johnson, J.T. Vaughey, R. Benedek, S. Hackney, Journal of Materials chemistry, 17 (2007) 3112-3125.
[3] C.S. Johnson, N. Li, C. Lefief, J.T. Vaughey, M.M. Thackeray, Chemistry of Materials, 20 (2008) 6095-6106.
[4] M. Bettge, Y. Li, K. Gallagher, Y. Zhu, Q. Wu, W. Lu, et al., Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 160 (2013) A2046-A2055.
[5] J.R. Croy, K.G. Gallagher, M. Balasubramanian, Z. Chen, Y. Ren, D. Kim, et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 117 (2013) 6525-6536.
[6] P.K. Nayak, J. Grinblat, M. Levi, E. Levi, S. Kim, J.W. Choi, et al., Advanced Energy Materials, 6 (2016).
[7] J. Lim, H. Bang, K. Lee, K. Amine, Y. Sun, Journal of Power Sources, 189 (2009) 571-575.
[8] W. West, J. Soler, B. Ratnakumar, Journal of Power Sources, 204 (2012) 200-204.
[9] J. Zheng, X. Wu, Y. Yang, Electrochimica Acta, 56 (2011) 3071-3078.