The ICI method is a facile way to follow the real-time internal resistance of a battery cycling at a constant current. Periodic transient current pauses are applied to obtain the potential response of the system [4]. From the potential-time relationship, both time-independent and time-dependent parts of the resistance can be derived. The time-independent resistance has been shown to correspond to the sum of the resistive elements in an equivalent circuit model of the electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) response [4]. In terms of the electrochemical process, the time-independent resistance includes the electronic, ionic and charge transfer resistances. In our recent work [5], the time-dependent part of the resistance from ICI measurements is analyzed by comparison with the existing porous electrode model. This enables us to characterize the mass transport in the positive electrode during the evolution of the solid species as captured by operando XRD.
Along with the resistance profile, this work will present the results from in-house operando XRD of a Li-S cell with our cell design, which is dedicated to preserve the reproducible electrochemical properties while offering a satisfactory signal-to-noise ratio in the XRD data. With the information of the mass transport in porous electrode and evolution of crystalline species, the concurrent analyses of both techniques will illustrate the dynamic interaction between the solid sulfur species and the carbon matrix at the positive electrode of Li-S batteries.
Figure: Operando XRD results with the diffraction pattern as the heatmap at the top, followed by the cell voltage (E), time-independent resistance (R) and time-dependent resistance (k). The legend for the colors used in the heatmap and following curves are labeled at the top and bottom of the graph.
References
[1] S. S. Zhang, “Liquid electrolyte lithium/sulfur battery: Fundamental chemistry, problems, and solutions,” J. Power Sources, vol. 231, pp. 153–162, 2013.
[2] M. Hagen et al., “Sulfur Cathodes with Carbon Current Collector for Li-S cells,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 160, no. 6, pp. A996–A1002, 2013.
[3] M. Wild et al., “Lithium sulfur batteries, a mechanistic review,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 3477–3494, 2015.
[4] M. J. Lacey, “Influence of the Electrolyte on the Internal Resistance of Lithium−Sulfur Batteries Studied with an Intermittent Current Interruption Method,” ChemElectroChem, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1997–2004, 2017.
[5] In Manuscript.
