PEO-Based Interlayers for Lagp-Type Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries

Sunday, 9 October 2022: 16:20
Galleria 4 (The Hilton Atlanta)
D. Steinle (Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU)), F. Wu (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)), G. T. Kim, S. Passerini (Helmholtz Institute Ulm (HIU)), and D. Bresser (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology)
Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are expected to play a decisive role for the realization of safer rechargeable batteries and may, additionally, allow for the employment of lithium-metal anodes, thus, paving the way for significantly higher energy densities. 1, 2 There are essentially two main groups of SSEs: (i) polymer and (ii) inorganic solids. The latter can be divided, e.g., into sulfide and oxide based electrolytes. 3 Among the oxides, the so-called NASICON-type electrolytes such as LAGP (lithium aluminum germanium phosphate) are considered as attractive low-cost alternative compared to sulfides. 4 Nonetheless, the incompatibility of LAGP with lithium metal accompanied by the formation of highly resistive interfacial reaction products, detrimentally affecting cycle life and rate capability, remain a great challenge. 5 To overcome this issue, the introduction of polyether (e.g., polyethylene oxide, PEO) as protective interlayer between the lithium-metal anode and the LAGP SSE was proposed. 6, 7, 8 The successful use of such interlayers, however, requires a fast and efficient charge transfer across this interlayer. Herein, we present a comprehensive investigation of PEO-based interlayers comprising varying amounts of ionic liquid-based electrolytes, which consist of N-butyl-N-methyl pyrrolidinium-based and lithium cations as well as bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (FSI-) and bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (TFSI-) anions. Optimized compositions and the incorporation of selected additives further enhances the charge transfer across this interlayer and the two interfaces with the LAGP electrolyte and lithium metal, enabling long-term stable cycle life and good rate capability of the resulting lithium-metal battery cells.

References

1. Gao, Z. et al. Promises, Challenges, and Recent Progress of Inorganic Solid-State Electrolytes for All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries. Adv. Mater. 30, 1705702 (2018).

2. Famprikis, T., Canepa, P., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 1278–1291 (2019).

3. Fan, L., Wei, S., Li, S., Li, Q. & Lu, Y. Recent Progress of the Solid-State Electrolytes for High-Energy Metal-Based Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1702657 (2018).

4. Bachman, J. C. et al. Inorganic Solid-State Electrolytes for Lithium Batteries: Mechanisms and Properties Governing Ion Conduction. Chem. Rev. 116, 140–62 (2016).

5. Hartmann, P. et al. Degradation of NASICON-Type Materials in Contact with Lithium Metal: Formation of Mixed Conducting Interphases (MCI) on Solid Electrolytes. J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 21064–21074 (2013).

6. Wang, C. et al. Suppression of Lithium Dendrite Formation by Using LAGP-PEO (LiTFSI) Composite Solid Electrolyte and Lithium Metal Anode Modified by PEO (LiTFSI) in All-Solid-State Lithium Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 13694–13702 (2017).

7. Bosubabu, D., Sivaraj, J., Sampathkumar, R. & Ramesha, K. LAGP|Li Interface Modification through a Wetted Polypropylene Interlayer for Solid State Li-Ion and Li–S batteries. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2, 4118–4125 (2019).

8. Wang, L., Liu, D., Huang, T., Geng, Z. & Yu, A. Reducing interfacial resistance of a Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 solid electrolyte/electrode interface by polymer interlayer protection. RSC Adv. 10, 10038–10045 (2020).