1662
Preparation and Characterization of Alternative Ni-Based Anode Materials for SOFCs

Tuesday, 2 October 2018
Universal Ballroom (Expo Center)
Y. Ishibashi, S. Futamura (Kyushu University, Faculty of Eng., Dep. of Hydrogen Energy Systems), Y. Tachikawa (Center for Co-Evolutional Social Systems, Kyushu University Faculty of Engineering), J. Matsuda (WPI-I2CNER, Kyushu University), Y. Shiratori (Department of Hydrogen Energy Systems, Kyushu University, International Research Center for Hydrogen Energy), S. Taniguchi (Next-Generation Fuel Cell Research Center (NEXT-FC), Kyushu University Faculty of Engineering), and K. Sasaki (Kyushu University, Next-Generation Fuel Cell Research Center)
Introduction

Ni is widely used as the anode material of SOFCs as a cermet containing ionic conductor and electronic conductor. In the SOFC power generation, the oxygen partial pressure in the downstream region of the SOFC systems increases, the metallic Ni can be oxidized to NiO, and thus volume expansion occurs1. Aggregation of adjacent Ni particles can degrade the electrode structure, which makes it difficult to fully utilize the fuel supplied. We have succeeded in fabricating an SOFC anode which is resistant to redox cycling using oxide conductors, La-doped SrTiO3 (LST) and Gd-doped CeO2 (GDC). In this study, we aim to develop (i) a novel electrode in which a metallic Ni catalyst is dissolved from the electrode material and precipitated on the surface of the anode in a reducing atmosphere (Ni-LST-GDC anode), and (ii) a novel electrode using a Ni-based alloy in the electrode framework (Ni-alloy-GDC anode)2,3.

Experimental

Alternative anode materials were prepared via wet process2,3. The cells were prepared by screen-printing the anode and the cathode followed by each sintering process in air. A platinum mesh was used for the current collector, and a Pt-based reference electrode was deposited on the cathode side for overvoltage separation between the anode and the cathode. The electrochemical performance of the fuel cells was evaluated from the I-V characteristics at the operating temperature of 800°C, using 3%-humidified hydrogen fuel. In order to evaluate the electrode activity, the electrode overvoltage was measured. The current interruption method was applied for evaluating the electrode overvoltages.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the I-V characteristics of the cells with the newly prepared Ni-LST-GDC anode, the Ni-impregnated anode, and the LST-GDC anode without adding Ni, at 800°C, in 3%-humidified hydrogen fuel. Regarding the anode voltage and the anodic overvoltage, the Ni-LST-GDC anode exhibited better performance than the anode composed only of LST and GDC. In comparison with the Ni-impregnated anode, however, the cell performance was still lower both in anode voltage, overvoltage, and IR loss. Figure 2 shows STEM micrographs indicating that the Ni catalyst particle precipitated could locate on the GDC. Anode materials design principles of alternative Ni-based anodes will be discussed. But most of Ni particles located on the electron-conductive LST. In contrast, the cell with Ni-alloy anode exhibited comparable performance compared to that with the Ni-SSZ cermet.

References

[1] Q. Fang, L. Blum, R. Peters, M. Peksen, P. Batfalsky, D. Stolten, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 40, 1128-1136 (2015).

[2] X. Shen and K. Sasaki, J. Power Sources, 320, 180 (2016).

[3] S. Futamura et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 164 (10), F3055 (2017).