Within this work we present a novel approach to prepare porous, polymer-derived Si(O,N)C ceramic for lithium storage. Through controlled crosslinking/pyrolysis process, materials with significantly higher surface area compared to standard polymer derived ceramic (PDC) route are synthesised.
Free carbon phase formed after pyrolysis of the polymeric samples is characterized by means of Raman spectroscopy. The characteristic carbon vibrations appear in all spectra [3]. Unusually high I(D)/I(G) ratio ranging from 1.8 to 2 is calculated, whereas fitting[4] reveals the presence of strong D3 band at 1540 cm-1, originating from the presence of amorphous carbon. In parallel, the intensity of G band attributed to an ideal graphitic lattice vibration mode with E2g symmetry remains low. In general, the increase of pyrolysis temperature leads to increase of ordering in free carbon phase. Elemental analysis reveals similar composition with average free carbon content of ~45 wt.%. Galvanostatic cycling with potential limitation show a significant improvement in capacity and rate capability (Figure1) for porous samples compared to dense sample. Namely discharge capacity increases from about 160 mAh·g-1 (Poly1_1100) to 320 mAh·g-1 for samples pyrolysed at 1100 °C (Poly2_1100). The sample exposed to 900 °C (Poly2_900) reveals very high capacities around 520 mAh·g-1 after 100 cycles (Figure1, insert). Furthermore, the porous materials demonstrate high and stable capacities when subjected to higher currents, namely 180 mAh·g-1 is recovered with the rate of 5C (1860 mA·g-1). In order to understand the differences in the ion storage mechanism in dense and porous materials solid state NMR study is in progress.
Acknowledgments:
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the German Research Foundation (DFG) SPP1473/JP8. Authors thank to Christina Schitco for fruitful discussions.
Literature:
1. Zhou, H.; Zhu, S.; Hibino, M.; Honma, I.; Ichihara, M. Advanced Materials 2003, 15, 2107–2111.
2. Roy, P.; Srivastava, S. K. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 2454–2484.
3. Ferrari, A. C. Solid State Commun. 2007, 143, 47–57.
4. Sadezky, A.; Muckenhuber, H.; Grothe, H.; Niessner, R.; Poschl, U. Carbon 2005, 43, 1731–1742.
Figure 1. Recovered capacity of Poly2_1100 at different C-rates ranging from C/2 up to 5C. Insert: Extended cycling curves for Poly1_1100, Poly2_1100, Poly2_900 at current of 72 mA·g-1.