803
Performance and Durability of an Alkaline Direct Methanol Fuel Cell Employing a Nitrogen Post-Doped PtRu/C Anode
Alkaline direct methanol fuel cells (ADMFCs) are attractive due to the enhanced electro-kinetics and lower methanol crossover compared to acid-based DMFCs1. However, performance and long-term stability results to-date are insufficient for commercial application. Recently, we have demonstrated that acid based DMFC anodes employing nitrogen pre and post-doped PtRu/C catalytic materials provide markedly higher performance and stability when compared to standard (un-doped) state-of-the-art commercial PtRu/C catalysts2,3,4. In this work, a commercial PtRu/C catalyst that has been post-doped with nitrogen (PtRu/C-N) is evaluated for the anode of a single-cell ADMFC. In the post-doped approach, nitrogen is incorporated onto the commercial PtRu/C (HS-10000) catalyst by ion implantation technique.
XPS analysis for the PtRu/C doped with nitrogen using high dosage ion implantation shows that 1-2 at.% nitrogen was incorporated into the material. The formation of lower-binding energy nitrogen species was particularly favored. Furthermore, the XPS and TEM results revealed that a fraction of PtRu particles reorganize to form small well-dispersed nanoparticles on the surface of the carbon. Fig.1 shows the methanol stripping voltammetry curves used to measure the electrochemical surface area (ECSA) for the PtRu/C-N and un-doped PtRu/C catalysts at 25¢ªC (scan rate 5mV sec-1). The PtRu/C-N exhibits higher ECSA (51.5 m2 g-1) as compared with the un-doped counterpart (35.4 m2 g-1).
Fig. 2 compares the ADMFC (using a Tokuyama A-201 membrane) performances for anodes with PtRu/C-N (3mg cm-2) vs. un-doped PtRu/C (3mg cm-2) in 2M NaOH + 2M CH3OH at 80¢ªC. In both cases, 40wt.% Pt/C (2mg cm-2) catalyst was used in the cathode. The anode with PtRu/C-N exhibits improved performance, particularly, in the ohmic and mass transfer regions as compared to the un-doped PtRu/C anode. The improved performance of nitrogen post-doped catalyst can be at least partially attributed to the observed higher ECSA as noted above. The PtRu/C-N delivers maximum power densities of 140 and 110 mW cm-2 whereas the un-doped PtRu/C delivers maximum power densities of 117 and 100 mW cm-2using oxygen and air, respectively. The performance of PtRu/C-N based anode among the best ever reported for an ADMFC under similar catalyst loading and measurement conditions. A long-term durability test for the ADMFC with the anodes of PtRu/C-N and un-doped PtRu/C is underway to see the effect of nitrogen on the stability of PtRu.
References
- A. V. Tripkovic, K. D. Popovic, B. N. Grgur, B. Blizanac, P. N. Ross and M. Markovic, Electrochim. Acta, 47 (2002) 3707.
- A. R. Corpuz, T. S. Olson, P. Joghee, S. Pylypenko, A. A. Dameron, H. N. Dinh, K. J. O’Neill, K. E. Hurst, G. Bender, T. Gennett, B. S. Pivovar, R. M. Richards and R. P. O’Hayre, J. Power Sources, 217 (2012)142.
- J. Prabhuram, S. Pylypenko, T. S. Olson, A. Dameron, A. Corpuz, K. Wood, K. O’Neill, K. Hurst, G. Bender, H. N. Dinh, T. Gennett, B. Pivovar and R. O’Hayre, J. Electrochem. Soc. 159 (11) (2012) F768-F778.
- A. Corpuz, K. N. Wood, S. Pylypenko, A. A. Dameron, J. Prabhuram, T. S. Olson, G. Bender, H. Dinh, T. Gennett, R. M. Richards and R. O’Hayre, J. Power Sources, 248 (2014) 296.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Army Research Office under grant #W911NF-09-1-0528 and the U.S. Department of Energy EERE, Fuel Cell Technologies Program, under Contract No. DE-AC36-08-GO28308 with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. The authors also acknowledge surface analysis and fuel cell testing facilities provided at NREL.