894
Reaction Mechanism of Thiourea as Suppressor in Electroless Cu Deposition Process
Since the electroless Cu deposition reaction involves both oxidation of formaldehyde and reduction of Cu2+ ion, the effect of TU on each reaction should be evaluated separately. For this, we employed “separated bath” system [3]; the bath without Cu2+ ion (oxidation bath), in which the only oxidation of formaldehyde proceeds, and the bath without formaldehyde (reduction bath), in which the only reduction of Cu2+proceeds, are connected with copper wire as shown in Fig. 1. The conditions of each bath are listed in Table 1.
When TU is added only to the oxidation bath, current density steeply decreased as shown in Fig. 2 (a), indicating that TU inhibits the oxidation of formaldehyde. On the other hand, when TU is added only to the reduction bath, current density slightly increased as shown in Fig. 2 (b), indicating that TU accelerates the reduction of Cu2+, probably due to the capturing effect of TU on Cu2+around the interface [4]. Overall, TU suppresses the Cu deposition reaction by inhibiting the oxidation reaction of reducing agent.
To elucidate the inhibition effect of TU on the reaction of formaldehyde, the adsorption states of TU and formaldehyde are calculated by DFT. Comparing these results, it is indicated that the adsorption energy of TU is much higher than that of formaldehyde. This shows that the adsorption of TU is much favorable on Cu substrate rather than that of formaldehyde. Hence, TU should inhibit the adsorption of formaldehyde by occupying the adsorption sites. Furthermore, from the DFT analysis, combined with SERS measurement, monomeric TU was indicated to adsorb on Cu surface via its NH2group because of the solvent effect.
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) and “Development of Systems and Technology for Advanced Measurement and Analysis” program of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan.
References
[1] D. Papapanayiotou, R. N. Nuzzo, R. C. Alkire, J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (10), 3366 (1998).
[2] G. M. Brown, G. A. Hope, D. P. Schweinsberg, P. M. Fredericks, J. Electroanal. Chem., 380, 161 (1995).
[3] M. Kunimoto, K. Endo, H. Nakai, T. Homma, Electrochim. Acta, 100, 311 (2013).
[4] J. S. Sallo, J. Kivel, F. C. Albers, J. Electrochem. Soc., 110, 890 (1963).