1738
Impact of Catalyst Performance on the Life-Cycle CO2 Emissions of Methanol Production By Direct Electrocatalytic Reduction of CO2
This work uses a hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to estimate how the choice of catalyst material and the performance of the catalyst influence the life cycle CO2 emissions associated with producing methanol by the eCO2RR process. Methanol is a potential drop-in transportation fuel, useful in both combustion engines and fuel cells. In this analysis, the CO2 reduction electrocatalyst and its carbonaceous support are explicitly modeled using process-based LCA. For the balance of the CO2 reduction cell system, a water electrolyzer is used as a surrogate technology, and incorporated using input-output LCA.
The CO2 emissions intensity of methanol produced by a prospective direct CO2 electrocatalytic reduction process are dominated by the emissions intensity of the electrical power used to carry out the electrocatalytic reduction. The emissions intensity is strongly influenced by the electrocatalyst's faradaic efficiency for the desired methanol product, but is only weakly sensitive to catalyst overpotential and current density. Ancillary processes such as CO2 capture and product methanol purification generate only a small fraction of the total emissions.
In a preliminary analysis, the total system CO2 emissions are 1.24 g CO2 emitted / g methanol, and 97% of these emissions are from generating the electricity used to drive the electrocatalytic reduction. (In contrast, methanol production from conventional natural gas reforming has an emissions intensity of 0.50–0.67 g CO2 emitted / g methanol.) The CO2 capture process, the product purification process, and the embodied emissions in the process equipment each contribute 2% or less to the CO2 intensity of the methanol product. The CO2 intensity of the product is therefore influenced by those technical parameters relevant to the generation and use of the electric power, especially the CO2 intensity of the electricity and the faradaic efficiency of the cathode catalyst for the desired methanol product. Doubling the faradaic efficiency from 25% to 50% would reduce the CO2 intensity by one-third (from 1.24 to 0.79 g CO2 emitted / g methanol). The emissions intensity is only moderately sensitive to catalyst overpotential: decreasing the cathode potential by about one third, from –0.8 V to –0.5 V, would decrease the emissions intensity by about one tenth (from 1.24 to 1.12 g CO2 emitted / g methanol). If the feedstock CO2 is provided from direct air capture instead of flue gas, the total emissions intensity of the methanol would be higher: at least 1.74 g CO2 emitted / g methanol, if the direct air capture process is powered by renewable energy sources, and higher still if powered by fossil sources.
The reference case eCO2RR system in this analysis contains a nanoparticulate copper catalyst (100 nm particle diameter) that reduces CO2 to methanol with 25% faradaic efficiency, a current density of 0.5 A cm-2, and 0.8 V of overpotential. The anode reaction is water oxidation, carried out with 0.3 V of overpotential. The feedstock CO2 provided to the reduction cell is captured from coal-fired power plant flue gas, with an emissions intensity of 97 g CO2 emitted / g CO2 captured. The emissions intensity of the electricity that powers the electrocatalytic reduction is 20 g/kWh, typical of photovoltaic generation.