In this work we detail the preparation of rutile TiO2 inverse opal (IO) structured samples and their application as an anode material for Li-ion batteries. We present X-ray diffraction, electron diffraction and Raman analysis to confirm that the IOs are pure rutile TiO2. The electrochemical performance of the TiO2 IOs is evaluated via cyclic voltammetry, rate capability testing and long cycle life galvanostatic tests. We demonstrate stable cycling of TiO2 IOs over 1000 and 5000 cycles, at specific currents of 75 and 450 mA g-1, respectively. The capacity values obtained when cycled at a specific current of 75 mA g-1 are greater than previously reported values for other TiO2 nanostructures, achieving an impressive capacity of ~ 140 mAh g-1 after 1000 cycles. (4-6) We demonstrate that our TiO2 IO anodes are capable of delivering high specific capacities with stable capacity rentention, achieving a capacity retention of ~ 82.4% between the 100th and 1000th cycles.
We present SEM images of TiO2 IO samples after cycling showing that the IO morphology is retained after thousands of galvanostatic cycles. Previous reports for anode materials such as Si and Ge nanowires have shown that volume expansion during cycling can lead to substantial capacity fading due to significant changes in nanostructure morphology.(7, 8) However, the porosity of the IO structure is able to accommodate volume changes to the TiO2 nanoparticles that make up the walls of the IO material. The 3D porous structure and morphology is retained via expansion of the IO walls into the pores. The level of structural integrity retained after 5000 cycles is not only a first for TiO2 nanostructures but also for nanostructured oxide anode materials in general.
Acknowledgements
This work was also supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) through an SFI Technology Innovation and Development Award under contract no. 13/TIDA/E2761. This publication has also emanated from research supported in part by a research grant from SFI under Grant Number 14/IA/2581.
References
1. Y. Yao, M. T. McDowell, I. Ryu, H. Wu, N. Liu, L. Hu, W. D. Nix and Y. Cui, Nano Lett., 11, 2949 (2011).
2. Y.-K. Sun, S.-T. Myung, B.-C. Park, J. Prakash, I. Belharouak and K. Amine, Nat. Mater., 8, 320 (2009).
3. J. Luo, J. Liu, Z. Zeng, C. F. Ng, L. Ma, H. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Shen and H. J. Fan, Nano Lett., 13, 6136 (2013).
4. X.-Y. Yu, H. B. Wu, L. Yu, F.-X. Ma and X. W. Lou, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 54, 4001 (2015).
5. Y. Gan, L. Zhu, H. Qin, Y. Xia, H. Xiao, L. Xu, L. Ruan, C. Liang, X. Tao, H. Huang and W. Zhang, Solid State Ion., 269, 44 (2015).
6. Z. Hong, M. Wei, T. Lan and G. Cao, Nano Energy, 1, 466 (2012).
7. L.-F. Cui, R. Ruffo, C. K. Chan, H. Peng and Y. Cui, Nano Lett., 9, 491 (2009).
8. T. Kennedy, E. Mullane, H. Geaney, M. Osiak, C. O’Dwyer and K. M. Ryan, Nano Lett., 14, 716 (2014).