In this work, MCDI performance was correlated to ion-exchange membrane thickness. The experimental design evaluated examined:
i.) commercially available ion-exchange membranes, ii.) ion-exchange layered electrodes of different thicknesses with electrode samples being prepared by drop casting followed by spray painting of ionomer layer on top of the electrode; and iii.) drop casting a mixture of electron conducting carbon with dissolved ionomer. A home-built, single-cell MCDI module was characterized with the different ion-exchange materials using a 275 ppm salt feed. MCDI performance was determined by quantifying salt removal and energy efficiency and the individual resistance contributions in the system through electrochemical impedance spectroscopy.
References:
1 Biesheuvel, P. M. & van der Wal, A. Membrane capacitive deionization. Journal of Membrane Science 346, 256-262 (2010).
2 Lee, J.-H. & Choi, J.-H. The production of ultrapure water by membrane capacitive deionization (MCDI) technology. Journal of Membrane Science 409-410, 251-256 (2012).
3 Dlugolecki, P. & van der Wal, A. Energy Recovery in Membrane Capacitive Deionization. Environmental Science & Technology 47, 4904-4910 (2013).
4 Sharma, K. et al. Transport of Ions in Mesoporous Carbon Electrodes during Capacitive Deionization of High-Salinity Solutions. Langmuir 31, 1038-1047 (2015).
5 Xu, X. et al. Facile synthesis of novel graphene sponge for high performance capacitive deionization. Scientific reports 5, 8458 (2015).
6 Jia, B. & Zhang, W. Preparation and Application of Electrodes in Capacitive Deionization (CDI): a State-of-Art Review. Nanoscale Research Letters 11, 1-25 (2016).
7 Zhao, R., Biesheuvel, P. M. & van der Wal, A. Energy consumption and constant current operation in membrane capacitive deionization. Energy & Environmental Science 5, 9520-9527 (2012).