314
Battery Functionality and Reactivity of a Cathode for Magnesium Ion Battery

Sunday, 28 May 2017: 17:00
Grand Salon D - Section 24 (Hilton New Orleans Riverside)
K. Suto, R. Zhang, and R. Mohtadi (Toyota Research Institute of North America)
Post lithium ion battery is highly demanding energy storage for smaller scale as stationary use to greater scale as grid storage, and vehicle use as well. Magnesium ion battery with metal magnesium as an anode has been investigated over decades because of its high theoretical capacity of magnesium (3833 mAh cm3) and relatively lower potential (0.7 V vs lithium) for naturally abundant mineral resources in “multivalent” metals with less risk on forming dendritic deposits [1]. After over a decade of finding of stable and reversible electrolyte based on Grignard agent such as APC [2], our finding of magnesium monocarborane [3] opened next door toward high energy density by its wider potential window up to 3.7 V and high current density more than 1mS cm-1, without corrosive issue which is intrinsic to conventional electrolytes containing chlorine.

Although of many efforts for electrolytes and electrodes, the battery system has lack of cathode capable of providing high potential and / or capacity with stable performance over numbers of cycles in charge and discharge, to takeover Li ion battery. Recently some challenges proved custom approach for magnesium ion effective to certain extent; eg. C60 [4] works as a mimic of cluster aspect of highly reversible Chevrel Mo6S8, and spinel Ti2S4 [5] presents the design of host framework with “soft” anion and ionic path.

In this study we approach to new insights into active materials by means of charge transfer. Interfacial analysis such as electrochemical impedance, XPS, etc., to the most established cathode, Chevrel phase Mo6S8 [1] in contact with MMC electrolyte gives some key factors of highly reversible cathode. Besides, our new approach for a cathode active material and its battery performance will be introduced for the next step of the reaction design.

References:

[1] J. Muldoon, C. B. Bucur, and Th. Gregory, Chem. Rev. 2014, 114, 11683.

[2] D. Aurbach, Z. Lu, A. Schechter, Y. Gofer, H. Gizbar, R. Turgeman, Y. Cohen, M. Moshkovich, E. Levi, Nature 2000, 407, 724.

[3] O. Tutusaus, R. Mohtadi, T. S. Arthur, F. Mizuno, E. G. Nelson, Y. V. Sevryugina, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 7900.

[4] R. Zhang, F. Mizuno, L. Chen,, Chem. Commn.. 2015, 51, 1108.

[5] X. Sum, P. Bonnick, V. Duffort, M. Liu, Z. Rong, K. A. Persson, G. Ceder, an L. F. Nazer, Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 2273.