Nonlinear electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (NLEIS) is an adjunct to EIS where larger amplitude sinusoidal current or potential perturbations are applied, and the nonlinear response of the battery is measured by the presence of higher harmonics in the output. Through a fairly straightforward analysis, a purely frequency-dependent second harmonic “impedance” Z2(ω) can be defined. Higher harmonic, or nonlinear, electrochemical impedance spectra can provide deep insights into processes occurring in the electrochemical device under test, including insights into physicochemical processes that are invisible to standard (linearized) EIS approach.5
Here, Samsung 18650 LiNMC | C batteries (capacity = 1500 mAh) were cycled under various rates and conditions, with NLEIS data acquired throughout the duration of its cycle time, for different states of charge. For this particular battery capacity and chemistry, a typical “moderate” current perturbation was 300 to 500 mA. The experimentally measured nonlinear electrochemical impedance spectrum Z2(ω) can be compared to results derived from the psuedo-2D model of a Li-ion battery6. Our physics-based approach for computing the nonlinear electrochemical impedance is a natural extension of the linearized EIS analysis that has been done previously.4
We show that NLEIS experiments have all the information of EIS, plus additional information on the electrode thermodynamics (low frequencies) and charge transfer kinetics. We show that aggressive cycling increases the kinetic impedance of the positive electrode, with little impact on the negative electrode. NLEIS shows a correlated effect, but it is possible to use Z2(ω) to discern more about the nature of the interfacial degradation occurring on the positive electrode. In short, using nonlinear impedance in coordination with the linear impedance can provide further insight into more sensitive physicochemical phenomena that can be used to diagnose the state of health of Li-ion batteries during aging.
[1] N. Lohmann, P. Weßkamp, P. Haußmann, J. Melbert, and T. Musch, J. Power Sources, 273, 613-623 (2015)
[2] C. Chen and P.P. Mukherjee, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17, 9812-9827 (2015)
[3] T. Osaka, D. Mukoyama, and H. Nara, J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, 2529-2537 (2015)
[4] M. Doyle, J. P. Meyers, and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc. 147, 99-110 (2000)
[5] J.R. Wilson, D. T. Schwartz, and S. B. Adler, Electrochimica Acta, 51, 1389-1402 (2006)
[6] T.F. Fuller, M. Doyle, and J. Newman, J. Electrochem. Soc. 141, 1-10 (1994)